CAVEAT: all the |show=
parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs edit
Administrative backlog edit
WP:AIV edit
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports edit
Bot-reported edit
- Dhdbtjdyuddvgn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- 103.211.191.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - List of snipers was changed by 103.211.191.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859161 on 2024-05-26T18:29:23+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 18:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- 45.144.166.154 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported edit
- ⵣⵉⵔⵉ ⴰⵎⵖⵏⴰⵙ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Highly disruptive; persistent unexplained changes and addition of unsourced content despite having been blocked and warned several times. Skitash (talk) 14:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- George Awad 1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On List of active Pakistan Navy ships: Evidently all edits done by the use are unsourced with no edit summary. Clearly not here to build a Wiki. Wikibear47 (talk) 16:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Vandalism after final warning. Continues to revert without source. Final warning given. Wikibear47 (talk) 17:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
- On List of equipment of the Pakistan Army: vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Persistent vandalism, disruptive editing. Wikibear47 (talk) 18:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- 142.160.253.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Leroy & Stitch: vandalism after final warning. IP user has been consistently trying to claim that this film is the fourth sequel feature film to Lilo & Stitch (2002) when it's actually the third sequel film (the other two sequel features are Stitch! The Movie [2003] and Lilo & Stitch 2: Stitch Has a Glitch [2005]), which would make it the fourth feature film in the Lilo & Stitch franchise. Despite my attempts to clarify why their edits are incorrect, and an attempt to compromise by rewriting sentences to clarify that it's fourth film in the franchise instead of the third sequel film, they remained adamant on incorrectly calling it the "fourth sequel film" and also used their edit reasons to tell me to "cut it out". –WPA (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- 103.211.191.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - vandalism after last warning in List of snipers.orangkalideres - talk - contribs 18:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs edit
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
---|---|
User requested | 1 |
Empty articles | 0 |
Nonsense pages | 0 |
Spam pages | 2 |
Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
Other candidates | 6 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
---|
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
---|
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 29 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP edit
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
Bot-reported edit
- USColleges (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Seo.cypherms (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Joe mama Obama 1 2 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Zombiefamilyloft (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Lex creatives agency (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- He was going to live forever or die in the attempt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Makicadestroyer (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "destroy" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Enteringmyusernamenow (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TaipeiKaoshiungTaiwanSept2018 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Jihadahmed123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Autism radar official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- CelestialVexxxTheChosen (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: celestialvecksckscksthechosen" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Даша тарасенко (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agentserial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported edit
- Wortsatz Gmbh (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Already blocked at (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wortsatz_Gmbh). Agent 007 (talk) 10:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Vaishnavi patient health care services (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Agent 007 (talk) 10:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level edit
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
List of United States presidential firsts edit
Reason: Request one week semi protection due to excessive IP vandalism pbp 03:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Obando, Bulacan edit
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target; see page history for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Patrick Shyu edit
Temporary semi-protection, reason: edit-warring by IPs, violates WP:3RR. orangkalideres - talk - contribs 03:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Issa Twaimz edit
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism several IPs. Adakiko (talk) 04:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Pokémon (TV series) edit
Semi-protection for a longer period: Inappropriate expansion of plot summaries by IP after page got unprotected. M S Hassan (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Jaan Se Pyara Juni edit
Reason: To avoid vandalism. Any unauthorized user or newly created account user could remove the redirect to create the page. So, it is better to enhance its protection and only the extended confirmed users are allowed to make edits in it. Thanks.StayCalmOnTress (talk) 06:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
List of streets in Cebu edit
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hi, I made this page to serve as an informative guide to the people of Cebu City and Cebu Province in general. It took me a very long time to compile all of this and publish it here in Wikipedia (I am a Local Historian by the way). However, as I check this page from time to time, I found out that some users has disruptively edited the entries in this page by changing my original template and format as well as editing names of historical personalities into a Spanish-style format (First Name, Last Name and Maiden Name) rather than the current Filipino Name Format (First Name, Middle Name (Maiden Name) and Surname or Last Name). Also, some streets which are Spanish in nature were "hispanized" like one time, when Juan Luna Street was converted to "Calle Juan Luna". Also, some of the users were deleting middle (maiden) name without any reasons. I don't know if they are too historically attached to the article but they start editing the page like its they are the ones who created it. I just want my page to be protected. I'm tired of editing this page which was marred by their inputs (I am editing this page while requesting this, 5/26/24). I hope you can grant me that peace of mind with regards to this page. Thank You!. AdmiralProudmore (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Alstom Movia R151 edit
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
National identity cards in the European Economic Area and Switzerland edit
- National identity cards in the European Economic Area and Switzerland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Too many changes to the title of the article without discussing on talk page. This topic also involved the use of the meaning of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and of the European Free Trade Association within the article. Kroby36 (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
South African Social Security Agency edit
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent external link spam target. Pahunkat (talk) 10:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Twitter Files edit
Semi-protection: Seems to be an ongoing edit war with no discussion. GMGtalk 11:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Vanished user 125 edit
Indefinite full protection: Talk page of vanished user. BangJan1999 12:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. and the user has unvanished anyway. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Hardik Pandya edit
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeing the history with article is consistently edited by IP’s changing the template parameters, adding unsourced information. EntrepreneurPedia (talk) 12:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
2020 PBA season edit
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 12:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Abid Sher Ali edit
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Socialist Appeal (UK, 1992) edit
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Article concerning fringe political organisations that seems to be subject to repeated recent editing activity by recently created, single-purpose accounts with suspected links to the organisation in question. Believe Extended-Confirmed protection necessary, temporary at first, to prevent the issue. Rambling Rambler (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Hitler was right edit
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page gets large amount of IP vandalism. This should stop that kind of lazy vandalism and save everyone some time. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 14:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Epirus edit
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption, crude ethno-nationalist POV pushing and source falsification. Khirurg (talk) 15:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Johnny Somali edit
Reason: Vandalism and unsourced material, requesting extended confirmed protection due to the page already being auto confirmed protected. RowanJ LP (talk) 17:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
List of states with nuclear weapons edit
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This page has been a constant target of vandalism from many different IPs for quite some time now. Permanent semi protection will help guard against vandalism and save everyone's time taken to do the same thing over and over. Wikibear47 (talk) 17:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Sariful Razz edit
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Shobnom Bubly edit
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Oscar Piastri edit
Reason: High level of vandalism from IPs and a newly registered user, all making the same joke. It had semi-protection for a couple days, but then when that expired, it started being vandalized again quite quickly. Gottagotospace (talk) 18:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Yakut language edit
Reason: I see so many IP addresses changing "Not to be confused" part into something else since April 2024 Who is Amire80 (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Scots language edit
Reason: Repetitive vandalism by various IP addresses Thatsamaro (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danial Afzal Khan edit
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by new User(s). Aloha27 talk 18:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level edit
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Meritt North edit
Reason: it is non-applicable Mooresklm2016 (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – The alternative would be for you to get blocked for disruptively removing the AfD notice. Favonian (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page edit
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests edit
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
1 protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC) |
0 template-protected edit requests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA edit
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
WP:RFP edit
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled edit
User:Prince of Erebor edit
- Prince of Erebor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 80 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor with patroller rights on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor(The Book of Mazarbul) 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:SheriffIsInTown edit
- SheriffIsInTown (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
User:MinorProphet edit
- MinorProphet (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I'd like to request Autopatrolled rights, please. A list of articles I created is here, and articles in various states of completion waiting in the wings are here. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Eagledj edit
- Eagledj (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have written 93 articles HERE, mostly music, biographies, golf, history, architecture, and people from Tennessee. I'd like to apply for auto patrolled status. I have done many BLPs including 5 GAs and I am familiar with the guidelines. Thank you.Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Monhiroe edit
- Monhiroe (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
have created 80 articles and to create more in the future. Monhiroe (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
User:KingEdinburgh edit
- KingEdinburgh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I regularly create military bio articles. KingEdinburgh (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
User:HagridLiving edit
- HagridLiving (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to request to become autopatrolled to simplify the process of creating pages about France and its heritage. HagridLiving (talk) 13:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
User:TrimmerinWiki edit
- TrimmerinWiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As part of NPP, I've noticed the high quality work of TrimmerinWiki, with similar supportive statements on their talk page. Their pages are well-developed and researched. Klbrain (talk) 10:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Page mover edit
User:Cremastra edit
- Cremastra (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Re-requesting after my one-month trial expired a month ago. I rename pages when it's necessary to make a round-robin swap, draftify new articles, and periodically close RMs. I also sometimes help in renaming categories for CfD. Cremastra (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not seeing any issues, but for re-requests I personally prefer to have a couple of sets of eyes before extending. Primefac (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Lightoil edit
- Lightoil (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi I am requesting permanent page mover rights. I have been using my rights to help close Requested Moves and WP:RMTR and to the lessor extent draftifying pages. I have been more careful since the last time I requested the rights, doing the required cleanup after moves. I am asking for the renewal early as it took a long time for my rights to be renewed the last time. Thank you for your consideration. Lightoil (talk) 00:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 01:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
User:JarrahTree edit
- JarrahTree (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
There are considerable issues relating to the Indonesian project content that have titles that require moving. JarrahTree 03:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC) JarrahTree 03:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done, no indication of need, barely any moves, let alone WP:RM or WP:RM/TR requests. Primefac (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Bettylella edit
- Bettylella (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Maria Medina Coeli, mistake in title
Good morning, as I explained on the Maria Medina Coeli talk page, the name is wrong. This error probably comes from the Harvard University source, which although prestigious and reliable, is wrong in this case, which is understandable if you are not fluent in the original language of the sources. To confirm my assertions, you can consult all the sources on the Italian page. Chiavenna and Como have dedicated a street to her, using the name Candida Lena Perpenti Bettylella (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer edit
User:RowanJ LP edit
- RowanJ LP (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
User:RITWIK MAHATA edit
- RITWIK MAHATA (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting for pending changes reviewer rights so that I can review pending changes. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Imsaneikigai edit
- Imsaneikigai (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
User:AnAlpineSymphony edit
- AnAlpineSymphony (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have read all the articles and tips for reviewing pending edits. I also have a large, significant history of editing many Engkish and Korean articles about Academics, Music theory, etc. AnAlpineSymphony (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
User:AlphaBetaGamma edit
- AlphaBetaGamma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've done reverting vandalism (Although I was on a hiatus since Golden Week as the vandal level hit 5) for some months now, with my edits growing over 2000 from 89ish including other works, and I request this permission to help with the works. I understand that I did make a misunderstandment couple of weeks ago and I have revised the guidelines to prevent another instance of that happening. (I've been making sure not to miss placing a uw as well). Not planning to request rollbacker until I stop making accidents. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:750h+ edit
- 750h+ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have made some very high quality articles (Aston Martin DB9 FA and Aston Martin Rapide at FAC) so I am very familiar with what content is reliable and what is not. I have reverted vandalism (in fact, reverting vandalism was the first edit I made) and whenever i seen vandalism, I take extreme pride in reverting it. Best 750h+ 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello User:750h+ . Nice seeing you here! From a quick look at your contributions, it seems like you usually don't leave a warning when reverting vandalism nor an semi-automated edit summary. It's very easy to do with tools like WP:Twinkle. Could you start warning editors? —Femke 🐦 (talk) 12:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Boneless Pizza! edit
- Boneless Pizza! (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have watched listed several article that have been protected as "pending changes" such as Charizard and Woody (Toy Story) and I would love to have an option to accept their edits if its constructive. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Rollback edit
User:BerryForPerpetuity edit
- BerryForPerpetuity (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm applying for rollback rights in order to help with my current recent changes patrolling. With rollback rights, I will gain access to more advanced counter-vandalism tools like AntiVandal and Huggle. I have been patrolling for about a month and made plenty of AIV reports (all of which were successful). BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 12:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done -Fastily 21:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
User:DANGA14 edit
- DANGA14 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I patrol a lot at RC, have made 216 edits, constantly warns users of vandalism, does not edit war. I'm not part of the CVU, but i revert vandalism quite a lot. DANGA14talk 12:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 77 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 12:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't edit too much on mainspace. DANGA14talk 13:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @DANGA14 FYI, successful applicants for Rollback rights will usually have at least 200 edits in the mainspace. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't edit too much on mainspace. DANGA14talk 13:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done per above. I noticed you started actively reverting vandalism a little over a week ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend more time gaining experience fighting vandalism before assigning you advanced permissions. Keep up the good work, and consider reapplying in a month. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 21:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
User:HirowoWiki edit
- HirowoWiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been active at recent changes for more than 3 months to help revert vandalism and report AIV, which is successful. Rollback rights need access to a counter-vandalism tool. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 01:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- A few concerns:
- A couple of days ago, you were warned about misleading edits summaries wrt this edit. Please explain, in your own words, why this edit was inappropriate.
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy?
- -Fastily 21:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I forgot to leave a warning message. Also, I made a misleading edit summary and not a typo. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 21:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moving forward, what will you do ensure that you are always leaving a notification? Right after your last reply, I noticed that you failed to notify an editor after making a this revert. What exactly do you mean by "made a misleading edit summary and not a typo"? Like I said, both the contents of the edit and edit summary are inappropriate. Can you explain why? -Fastily 06:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've undid the last edit; they should leave a warning message. I changed the template with uppercase letters like {{pp|small=yes}} → {{Pp|small=yes}} and {{featured article}} → {{Featured article}}. The template shouldn't be changed in this article. Thank you for the explanation. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 07:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why are you being so evasive with your answers? I'm not asking you trick questions or attempting to embarrass you. Please re-read my reply above and answer the questions please. -Fastily 05:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I will ensure to leave a warning message after reverting your edit. The misleading edit summary referred to providing incorrect information in the summary, which did not accurately reflect the changes made in the edit. This can be misleading to other editors who check the edit history. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 08:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why are you being so evasive with your answers? I'm not asking you trick questions or attempting to embarrass you. Please re-read my reply above and answer the questions please. -Fastily 05:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've undid the last edit; they should leave a warning message. I changed the template with uppercase letters like {{pp|small=yes}} → {{Pp|small=yes}} and {{featured article}} → {{Featured article}}. The template shouldn't be changed in this article. Thank you for the explanation. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 07:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moving forward, what will you do ensure that you are always leaving a notification? Right after your last reply, I noticed that you failed to notify an editor after making a this revert. What exactly do you mean by "made a misleading edit summary and not a typo"? Like I said, both the contents of the edit and edit summary are inappropriate. Can you explain why? -Fastily 06:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- I forgot to leave a warning message. Also, I made a misleading edit summary and not a typo. HirowoWiki (talk | contribs) 21:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Sneezless edit
- Sneezless (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been patrolling recent changes for almost a year now, and the rollback right would mean I could start using Huggle for that, as I've been meaning to do for a while now. Sneezless (talk) (contribs) 21:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 06:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tips. I'm already using Redwarn for warnings, but did you notice any particular times when I didn't properly warn users? I've been using the ProblemWelcome and WelcomeIP templates instead fairly often, since most editors I'd otherwise use a warning template on are new editors. Sneezless (talk) (contribs) 13:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Clearfrienda edit
- Clearfrienda (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm requesting the rollback right so I can use Huggle when I'm patrolling recent changes. I was granted the right on trial about a year ago but I never got around to requesting it again. Clearfrienda 💬 04:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. Given that your rollback trial ended almost a year ago, I'd like to see you spend time actively participating in RecentChanges patrol before granting you this right. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 06:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Air on White edit
- Air on White (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been active on RCP over the past month. I would like rollback for the particular case where a vandal persistently vandalizes the same page. It takes time to load via Twinkle and is frustrating when my attempt to revert fails because the vandal or someone else has made more edits. I believe rollback will save me time and make my efforts against vandalism more effective. Air on White (talk) 03:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 05:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do not warn users in what I assume to be legitimate content disputes, as warning would be patronizing and unconducive to discussion. The user who added the name of one of Pat Morita's grandchildren appeared to be acting in good faith; I reverted not because he was vandalizing or disruptive, but because the person did not have his own Wikipedia article. The argument here is not about vandalism, NPOV or BLP, but simply a content dispute about what is proper to include in the infobox. Meanwhile, in the case of Matthew Heineman, that was the third edit by a user who added BLP violations who was hopping to a different IP for every edit. It is useless to warn such a user, who I had already warned twice on two different IPs, just as it is useless to further warn a user who has received a level 4 warning and is still vandalizing. My failure to warn the vandal on The Chris Moyles Show was a mistake on my part, possibly because I forgot after I restored the page to remove vandalism by multiple IPs. I hope this helps you understand my editing process. Air on White (talk) 06:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you take a look at my contributions, it will be beyond obvious that I am aware of Twinkle and am regularly using it to warn users. Air on White (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do not warn users in what I assume to be legitimate content disputes, as warning would be patronizing and unconducive to discussion. The user who added the name of one of Pat Morita's grandchildren appeared to be acting in good faith; I reverted not because he was vandalizing or disruptive, but because the person did not have his own Wikipedia article. The argument here is not about vandalism, NPOV or BLP, but simply a content dispute about what is proper to include in the infobox. Meanwhile, in the case of Matthew Heineman, that was the third edit by a user who added BLP violations who was hopping to a different IP for every edit. It is useless to warn such a user, who I had already warned twice on two different IPs, just as it is useless to further warn a user who has received a level 4 warning and is still vandalizing. My failure to warn the vandal on The Chris Moyles Show was a mistake on my part, possibly because I forgot after I restored the page to remove vandalism by multiple IPs. I hope this helps you understand my editing process. Air on White (talk) 06:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
User:RodRabelo7 edit
- RodRabelo7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello,
Roughly a month ago, I requested to be granted rollback rights. The administrator who responded, Fastily, asked me to patrol recent changes for a month before requesting the permission again. Having done so, I believe I am now ready to become a rollbacker. As mentioned in my previous request, I've been a rollbacker on Commons for quite some time now – over a year –, understanding how the tool works and the risks associated with it, and committing myself not to misuse it, under the risk of losing it temporarily or permanently, and even being blocked.
Having patrolled recent changes for this month, with over 700 reversions in the main domain, I'm now more confident than ever in distinguishing between obvious vandalism, non-constructive changes, and good-faith edits, for example. I always make sure to notify editors after reverting their edits, so that these newcomers are not "bitten" (e.g. 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b, 5a, 5b). Sometimes I even notify and guide them without reverting their edits; that's why I currently have a bit more warnings on user pages than reversions in the main domain.
I also have a constant presence in Administrator intervention against vandalism, with a considerably high success rate (that is, the ratio between blocked accounts and reports). Of the more than 20 accounts I reported there (ignoring the IPs), only one was not blocked, for reasons I now understand well, so these will not be repeated. I have even opened a checkuser request as a result of my anti-vandalism activities (although this request was deleted in favor of one created later, I don't know precisely why).
Therefore, I would like to finally become a rollbacker. As mentioned before, I would like to have access to semi-automatic tools, namely Huggle, which would greatly facilitate my anti-vandalism work, making it more efficient. I enjoy patrolling recent changes, and rollback rights would certainly make my life easier.
Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Template editor edit
User:Sundostund edit
- Sundostund (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. I am re-applying for template editor rights, which I was granted on a temporary basis by Primefac (permalink) on 24 February; it is about to expire at 00:00, on 24 May. As I promised in my original request back in February, and as can be seen, I didn't misuse this right in any way. I used it in a very responsible manner, on a periodical basis, and I'm no longer obliged to bother others with template-protected edit requests, and basically have them to do my work for me when it comes to HRTs. Naturally, I would prefer if this right is extended on a permanent basis, but that is up to admins to decide. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user was granted temporary template editor rights by Primefac (expires 00:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 13:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sundostund, could you give some examples of say, five template-protected templates that you've worked on since being granted this right? Primefac (talk) 12:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
edit
Policies and links