Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
- Arya Shakh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1067 (LTA 1067, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Setting up your user page as a first edit is perfectly fine. Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 2a00:23c5:50e8:ee01:79fb:bc74:bedf:ff0c (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 93.138.225.190 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Transformers: Rescue Bots was changed by 93.138.225.190 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876937 on 2024-04-19T17:56:01+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 17:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- W1Wkk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 2402:4000:20c3:61be:3120:cfda:a55b:5495 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 70.118.55.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 24.55.32.100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- CandleGuy1111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Ghidorah, the Three-Headed Monster was changed by CandleGuy1111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953872 on 2024-04-19T22:53:03+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 22:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 176.204.124.176 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Highly disruptive block-evading sock of 2001:8F8:1B69:0:0:0:0:0/49, using other IPs such as 176.204.159.105, 176.204.158.121, 176.204.115.34, 31.218.17.8, and 31.218.180.224. Please consider blocking their IP ranges, as they persistently switch IPs to evade their blocks and engage in vandalism. This has been going on for a long time now. Skitash (talk) 19:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 2A02:C7C:5D7F:EE00:24D2:3151:5932:EC30 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Juvenile (rapper) (diff): vandalism after final warning. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:5CE6:6100:0:0:0:0/64. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Frenchie vandal. Binksternet (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: 2A02:C7C:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Add this IP as well:2A02:C7C:5D7F:EE00:302A:E770:9B8:2397 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- And this one:2A02:C7C:DB3A:4900:8CB2:B4CE:8C28:9425 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- More:
- 1.2A02:C7C:E3B2:700:D9DD:2D23:F0E1:EC48
- 2.2A02:C7C:D37E:BC00:5DA:6910:EEFD:1396
- 3.2A02:C7C:4A59:E300:9D0A:CB40:681B:FB7F
- More to come
- Yes most of them haven't been sufficently warned but seems like all one person. Possibly block the entire /32 range. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- And more:
- 2A02:C7C:F00F:BA00:A412:115E:23CF:79D6
- 2A02:C7C:470A:4F00:E0C5:D1FB:C8B6:4048
- 2A02:C7C:EA2D:2500:C938:ECF6:8F5B:FA0A
- 2A02:C7C:384F:7F00:90AF:8DFF:9C06:87ED
- These 10 IPs have all been disruptive in the past 4 hours. Many more if you look further Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:408:C500:9FF0:E9C5:7EC5:390:A536 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On List of You Can't Do That on Television episodes (diff): vandalism after final warning. Long-term abuse from Michigan, blocked as Special:Contributions/2601:408:C580:6AF0:0:0:0:0/64. Previously blocked as Special:Contributions/73.18.231.246 and Special:Contributions/108.72.93.169. Level 4 warning delivered to User talk:2601:408:C500:9FF0:D1D1:D791:B41C:802B. The /52 range should be blocked: Special:Contributions/2601:408:C500:9000:0:0:0:0/52. Binksternet (talk) 19:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:18A:C67F:54C0:4C9D:5AC:CF8F:BAC3 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On List of sopranos in non-classical music (diff): vandalism after final warning. Binksternet (talk) 20:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 1011bogh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Equine-man (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) This user is vandalizing the Fallout (TV series) page by putting out "That's some 🐂💩 if I've ever heard it. Fan reception has actually been divisive from what I am aware. Someone prove me wrong please." for the citation. They did it at least 3 times and I reverted their edits. Please block them for disruptive editing for at least a month or two. Mxhyn16 (talk) 22:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- CandleGuy1111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism, [WP:NOTHERE] intentionally trying to get banned (ref diff name) 1 2 Johand199 (Talk) 22:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- 2603:9009:601:8B54::/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – On Despicable Me (film) (diff): vandalism after recent release of block. Resumed on range off 1 month block. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- Lickmypedia (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "LickFoo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- BZPN.bot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Kedvine promotionz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used z instead of s attempting to skip filter: Promotional? 2. Violating string: kedvine promotions" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 22:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Reginamalayaleeassociation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Sonnuu499 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username. User has made promotional edits to WP:AFC/R.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 09:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. (stage names are generally treated the same as real names) The issue here is their edits, not the username. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 16:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Melinda Looi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Well-known person? See the article Melinda Looi. Geoff | Who, me? 12:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well it doesn't look like impersonation, and real names are allowed.
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Secretlondon (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Glane23, I think I read WP:REALNAME the same way you do, but it does seem like there's no impersonation here. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well it doesn't look like impersonation, and real names are allowed.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
World War III
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Multiple WP:CT areas, mostly related to them. Among them WP:CT/EE and WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Babette Brown
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from new accounts and IPs. Aguy777 (talk) 08:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Evidence and documentation for the Holocaust
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism after pc protection. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please also enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Burney Relief
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content and grammatical errors, with nonsensical edit summaries, from various 50. and 74. IP addresses since 16:06, 4 December 2021. Panian513 14:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Panian513: Please try to leave a user talk page notice explaining the issues when these edits happen, even if they are changing IPs. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Hermitage, Pennsylvania
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 20:40, 4 September 2023. Panian513 16:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
April 30
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. disruptive editing by a IP user who has changed their IP at least once. I suggest just protecting the page for one day. Shadow311 (talk) 16:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:b81:100::/64 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Taotie
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Mass media in Israel
Reason: WP:ARBPIA3 Ccole2006 (talk) 17:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Emil Pagliarulo
Reason: IP vandalism Scu ba (talk) 17:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I would not call it vandalism. There's an edit-war. The side that's removing content is appealing to WP:BLP policy, albeit without Wikipedia jargon. Per policy, their concerns ought to be addressed before restoring the content. That's not happening. The fully restored article does read like an attack page. This revision that the IP tried seems without urgent problems. I would suggest protecting it there and directing the parties to seek consensus for addition of controversial content, per BLP. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 18:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Aaahh!!! Real Monsters
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 8 out of 10 Cats vandalism. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 18:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Tahanang Pinakamasaya
Reason: Persistent unreferenced and unexplained edits from IP users. Article also has a history of frequent vandal edits since its inception. Hotwiki (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 19:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Please use WP:AIV or WP:EWN for issues primarily with one user/IP. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
SpaceX Starship
Reason: In the last two days, there have been several edits changing the result of IFT-3 from success to, partial failure, failure, or removing IFT-3 altogether. A RfC was closed earlier today on this matter, supporting success, but this has been disputed. The SpaceX Starship article was protected until four days ago, due to similar issues shortly after the launch of IFT-3. Redacted II (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Solitude (Black Sabbath song)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Black Sabbath (album)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Madam
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent disruptive edits by two different IP addresses (possibly 2 same users using different IPs or dynamic IPs or whatever). See the page history. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
UEFA Euro 2024 broadcasting rights
Reason: I need to ask again, beacuse, as expected, ipuser ignored my calls to take it to talk page, he had ignored also my asking for him have a account so i could talk with him in a way we could reach consensus, so i can safely assume that he purposely avoided any type of consensus talk, no matter what i tried.
There has no other way, this is the not the first time it happens, i am asking for semi-protection not as preventive measure, but as last resort agnaist the lack ot interest in make consensus and as a way to avoid a edit war that would make more harm than good Meganinja202 (talk) 21:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin but... "he had ignored also my asking for him have a account so i could talk with him in a way we could reach consensus" is just wrong. No IP is obligated to listen to you and get an account. You can talk with them, and reach consensus, without them needed to have an account.
- You also could have posted on the IP's talk page. @Meganinja202 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- does ip have talk page? as far i know, only users has talk page
Also i want be clear, its not my intention force him to have account, I want to talk with him and try reach a consensus, but as far i tried, he ingored my plea for debate into a consensus, I feel he may try make it into a edit war if things stay as it is. Meganinja202 (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- IPs have talk pages. You asked once and didn't post anywhere. "I feel he may try make it into a edit war" - it's already an edit war, one that you are nearly just as wrong in. @Meganinja202 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- As I said before, this is the not the first time I tried to put a final conensus about the theme, each time I tried on the last 12 months to put a consensus about it, the IP user had ignored any plea for talk, I will try find his talk page, but i dont have any hope he will try be comunicative about it Meganinja202 (talk) 22:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Impeachment of Alejandro Mayorkas
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Psherman122 (talk) 21:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please enforce as WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Which IPs? If anything the only unconstructive edits I'm seeing are from the one account falsely accusing the people reverting them of vandalism. – 143.208.238.228 (talk) 22:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Prism
Reason: It is disorganised Kingwiki123 (talk) 14:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Please don't post to WP:RFFP again unless you understand what it's for. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Direct Democracy Ireland
Reason: Protected by NeilN (since retired from Wikipedia) in 2015. Tensions have most likely died down since then. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 19:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. The article isn't edit protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is move protected. Although I've directed that to WP:RMT, so that may become moot. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 19:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Free Church of England
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary as the problems that caused vandalism have now passed. I think that Semi protected status would now be most suitable. Arrowe6365 (talk) 21:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Draft:Anton Mazurov
Change "Draft:Anton Mazurov" to "Anton Mazurov" ZIKZU (talk) 17:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Submit it for review by putting {{subst:submit}} at the top of the page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 18:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
History of Palestine
The article refers to Palestine as a "country", even in the ancient period. This is false and misleading. The evidence is in the article itself. This was done with the intention of accusing Israel of invading a "country" called Palestine. That's a lie.
- Oxford Dictionary defines "coun·try" as a nation with its own government. It defines "na·tion" as a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language. Neither of definitions applies to Palestine, certainly not before 1988, when the Palestine National Council proclaimed the State of Palestine. That State is NOT recognized by over 50 member-states of the UN.
- Before 1988, it was a REGION with a NAME, under foreign rule, not a "country". The name "Palestinian" used to refer to both Jewish and non-Jewish residents, who lived there, side-by-side, for centuries.
- The last time it was independent, indigenous, and self-governing was under the ancient Hebrews. - Since the ancient Hebrews, it's been under continuous foreign rule by foreign invaders.
- 1918 - 1948: British
- 1516 - 1918: Ottoman
- 636 - 1516: Islamic Arab
- 63 BCE - 636 AD: Roman (who named it Palestine to erase Jewish identity)
- 330 - 63 BCE: Greco-Macedonian
- 539 - 330 BCE: Persian
- 616 - 539 BCE: Babylonian and Hebrew
- 830 - 664 BCE: Assyrian and Hebrew
- 1200 - 539 BCE: Hebrew
- 1550 -1400 BCE: Egyptian
- 3100 - 1500 BCE: Canaanite
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Palestine Johnywhy (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
1 template-protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser
User:REDACTED403
I would like access to make typo error fixing edits to the wiki, as existing tools I have perms for don't let me filter for those. -REDACTED403 (talk) 05:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) User:Can't stop the stopr
I would like to improve my workflow with copywriting on Wikipedia, as finding typos can be tedious and AWB can help with this. Can't stop the stopr (talk) 20:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed |
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
---|
Extended confirmed |
Requests for file mover |
---|
File moverUser:Mcljlm
Reason for requesting file mover rights I'm an autoconfirmed user. There are times when a file title needs changing but currently I'm unable to do that. Mcljlm (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewerUser:Pbritti
Requesting a trial period of a month or less (dealer's choice) to address the backlog. I was previously granted this permission last summer but resigned them after a request to do so stemming from my repeated draftification of articles on potentially notable subjects that were created by disruptive editors (a more detailed accounting of that can be found in the discussion that took place on my talk page). Essentially, I wouldn't do that again, instead following the current NPP best-practices of leaning on more procedural alternatives like PROD, AfD, and improvement tags. I have a good amount of experience in AfC, have participated in a decent number of AfDs, and have a strong track record with my own article creations. I can provide additional context or affirmations of understanding of the current NPP standards as requested. I would prefer a trial period of at least two week so that my use of the permission can be observed and critiqued with enough examples. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC) User:Jtrrs0
I've got some experience at AfD, both participating and nominating. I have also written one article which was approved at AfC and got C-rated. I also have relevant experience in anti-vandalism, which shows I always try to be friendly to newcomers and I am always open to being corrected. I'd obviously be happy to have it granted on a trial basis. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Aplucas0703
I have made many constructive edits to Wikipedia, and have a decent amount of experience in Articles for Creation, and I have approved AfC reviewer for nearly 1 year. I have had no controversy thus far while working in this area. I mainly want to focus on patrolling the backlog of redirects, but occasionally I would also review articles. I also know my limits, and only work in the areas I am confident in, or I seek help. I am big on assuming the good faith of editors and pointing them in the right direction if their efforts are misguided, as I often do at AfC. aaronneallucas (talk) 04:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) User:Dan Leonard
I'm nearing the end of my trial period just as the May backlog begins and I'd like to keep my permissions to participate. I've been intermittently active with new page patrol and I think my page curation log should show fairly uncontroversial activity and AfDs with consensus for my proposals. Reviewing the log myself there are two articles I marked as reviewed but were later deleted, but both appear to have been deleted for G5 (created by banned user) and not for notability or other content reasons. Dan • ✉ 06:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Klbrain
I'm coming to the end of a two-month trial, and write to request that this access be extended. I've worked on NPP and, as asked, AfD. Many of these AfDs have been my proposals, which has been a helpful learning experience! Klbrain (talk) 09:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Storye book
On 13 December 2023 I was granted a 3-month new page reviewer rights trial, which expired on 12 March 2024. I reviewed 5 new articles in 2023, and 8 new articles in 2024. My habit is to spend a lot of time on each article, helping to expand them sometimes, and helping to bring some of them to DYK - which is why I did not attempt to achieve high numbers of new page article reviews. Being overloaded with WP research (some for my local Civic Society, which wanted WP articles on several historical subjects - all for free of course) I have had to miss out on new page reviews for a while. I was also needed to help with the recent DYK review backlog. But I would like to get back to it. So if you think that I have been useful so far, please would you kindly extend or confirm my new page reviewer rights? I have added my name to the May 2024 new page review list, but would like confirmation that I am still a valid member of this working group. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Storye book (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Grahaml35
Hello! In December of 2023 I applied for New Page Reviewer Rights and given a 1 month trial period then again in January of 2024 I was granted 3 months. I am here today to apply for permanent rights. Over the last 90 days I have reviewed 370 articles. A short background on myself I've been on Wikipedia for over eight years and have created 47 active article on EN Wikipedia. I have strong knowledge of the policies that a NPP reviewer must follow and how each article should be treated. I would like to to continue to help decease the large article backlog currently on Wikipedia. I would be happy to answer any questions. Thank you! Grahaml35 (talk) 17:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Knowledgegatherer23
I would like to participate in the upcoming backlog drive. I have done a trial period before. Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 17:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC) User:Orange sticker
Hi, I'd like to help with the backlog, I enjoy doing maintenance tasks like WP:CAT and WP:ORPHAN and I've submitted AfDs for articles I've come across in this process: as well as taking part in more contentious deletions. Obviously still learning but have experience of quite a few different outcomes now such as redirect, merge and transwiki options. Orange sticker (talk) 11:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC) User:SafariScribe
Hi, I'm volunteering to help in patrolling new pages on Wikipedia. Over the months I have stayed here, I've learnt much on relating with editors including the early mistakes I did at first; those have improved my person. It's also pleasing participating in the May drive. Thanks for considering me.— Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) User:NYMan6
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover
User:Xkalponik
I'm an Articles for Creation reviewer and I need this right to make things easier. One of my recent submission reviews needed a move without redirect, but I couldn't as I didn't have that right yet. There have been many such incidents and will be in the future. I wish to be granted this right and I believe I meet the requirements now (was declined previously). Thank you. X (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC) X (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives
I am requesting this right for the following reasons:
I have participated in various requested moves and I have performed some myself in order to acquire to naming conventions (both within pages in the main space and from my sandboxes to the main space), and I have also started a few move discussions too. I know about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including naming conventions, and I often take part in AFD and other discussions, and I also have created articles and categories. I am happy to answer any questions or do a trial run. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewerUser:Nihonjoe
There are a number of articles on my watchlist that require pending changes to be reviewed. This would facilitate reviewing those changes and approving or declining them as appropriate. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Grabup
With two years of dedicated service and prior receipt of reviewer rights twice, I respectfully requesting this right again. My intent is to assist in reviewing pending changes and lightening the workload for fellow editors. I remain committed to upholding Wikipedia's standards of accuracy and reliability. Granting me this privilege again would enable me to contribute more effectively to the platform's mission of disseminating knowledge to the world. Grabup (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:NebY
I can't say I'd use this often and am not intending to patrol, but a number of the pages on my watchlist have pending-changes protection (even by my request) and I do sometimes see good edits to them awaiting acceptance. I am accustomed to filtering out vandalism, test edits, unsupported edits and the like, and to following WP:BLP (though a lot of my watchlist's deep in ancient history and mythology). NebY (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
RollbackUser:Neko Lexi
Reason for requesting rollback rights Hi! I would like to have rollback rights, because I keep seeing persistant Vandalism in articles, I usually warn editors and or IP users about that and I use Twinkle for that too. And I usually revert vandalism but It usually doesn't work properly because of my computer problems. Thanks! Starixxgamerrix (talk) 05:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Me Da Wikipedian
Mainly want them so that I can use a lot of the anti-vandalism tools, many of which are unusable/much more annoying without rollback. Also a few instances where in actual rollback would be helpful. I have done a lot of anti-vandalism work. I had 5 reverts at the very beginning that were problematic (my thinking is explained at my talk page), but I think I've gotten more aware of the policies and there has only been one other issue with my reverts since, which was caused mostly by the fact that I didn't realize there was an ongoing edit war, just saw an edit summary of "." removing content, and reverted. I have read Wikipedia:Rollback and understood it. I know what is intentional disruptive editing/vandalism, and a good faith mistake. For example, a typo is usually an honset mistake, and blanking a page is usually intentional, particularly if done repeatedly. Done a lot of anti vandalism work. I have like 140 edit to the user talk space, vast majority of which are warning for bad edits. Searching "revert" brings up 120 results in my contributions, the vast majority of which are me reverting vandalism. Thank you and have a nice day! Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
User:TheTechie
I am TheTechie. I was suggested by User:Synorem to become a rollbacker as I, at least in their words, am encouraged to apply for rollback. I meet the requirements as follows:
Requesting permission because of these reasons. Thanks --- thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Vestrian24Bio
Reason for requesting rollback rights: Hi! I am Vestrian24Bio; I have been editing on Wikipedia for almost 2 years now, I have made 2000+ edits and I have already reverted 200+ vandalisms, mostly using Twinkle. See my contributions here. Now, having the Rollback permission would be more helpful in patrolling vandalisms and it would grant me access to using the AntiVandal thus, making it easier to fight vandalisms. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 04:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Myrealnamm
Reason for requesting rollback rights. I have at least 200 mainspace edits, frequently warn users, and no edit warnings. However, I do not yet have a month of experience patrolling Recent Changes. I would like to request rollback rights because it would be easier for me to revert vandalism through View History. I have a habit of going back to View History after comparing edits, and having the Rollback user right would make it easier for me to revert edits on View History pages. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 15:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
User:MuffinHunter0
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editorUser:Nihonjoe
I regularly edit templates while working on various articles on my watchlist, or when creating new articles that are part of something covered by a template. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Usage
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |