Administrative backlog
Reports
- Huy1984 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 110.138.91.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1086 three times in the last 5 minutes (Disruptive edit summaries, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Omarstilus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Samadkhanali86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Vehicle insurance was changed by Samadkhanali86 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95021 on 2024-06-14T05:50:25+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 05:50, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 174.243.181.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Actiondramlovers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yaughaagthao0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 135 five times in the last 5 minutes (Repeating characters, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:40e2:d:d7fc:8000:: (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:54, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 176.126.229.225 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 46 five times in the last 5 minutes ("Poop" vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 148.253.167.121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- Jlam2012 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Odinthagod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On David Eccles (businessman): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. A previous warning to the user indicated that further attempts at adding copyvios content would be treated as such. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 04:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Retonom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Talk:Robert Sungenis: WP:NPA, WP:NOTHERE, trolling. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Muhammad Daniyal Bin Saeed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 67.40.203.18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Jonathan Krisel (diff): vandalism after final warning. Johnnie Bob (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:4070:2098:1E08:0:0:983:28AD (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Repeated addition of unsourced content. Aguy777 (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Samadkhanali86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Renewal6 (talk) 07:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2409:4052:2E43:4A35:1DD2:1F94:3728:AD14 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – LTA. Pahunkat (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Femi247 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Annh07 (talk) 09:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 185.2.147.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) repeated vandalism despite being notified multiple times since November. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 09:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2A00:23C5:2B8F:B801:1806:EB76:9FD6:89B6 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - persistant removal of content and unexplained edits. Mdann52 (talk) 09:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- JAB626 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On PageRank (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. Belbury (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Cosstudios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- UltimativerHüterDesWissens (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Aliwudbflaiurnfaweufn3or (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: aliwudbphlaiurnphaweuphn3or" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- BrokenTree124 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used k instead of c attempting to skip filter: role account?. Violating string: brocentree124" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 10:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ladygagitaofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- MBHbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Unauthorised bot. Fram (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: MBHbot is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 20:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't EXEMPTBOT apply for this? Nobody (talk) 12:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation. Userspace editing is allowed per EXEMPTBOT. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I reported it here because it had edited the mainspace. That page has since been deleted. Fram (talk) 14:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- And they made further mainspace edits between 2014 and 2022. Fram (talk) 14:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- The edits between 2014 and 2022 are a consequence of the account of being a filemover and a bot on commons. Whether this would have continue would depend on the bot owner's approach in following up on renaming files on commons. – robertsky (talk) 01:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation. Userspace editing is allowed per EXEMPTBOT. – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Salvio giuliano 19:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- If we are not going to block them I think we need to keep watching them as I expect they will edit without the bot flag. Secretlondon (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Secretlondon, I agree. I am somewhat on the fence here, but only because the account is so old... As far as I'm concerned, the username violation is clear and WP:EXEMPTBOT does not apply in this case, because that policy does not deal with usernames, whereas WP:BOTNAME does. — Salvio giuliano 11:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Salvio giuliano Since it is actually a bot that has the bot flag on multiple other wikis wouldnt't it be more disruptive to those wikis if we make them change the name? Nobody (talk) 11:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- We cannot and should not make them change their name.Secretlondon (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- The issue is that I think it is editing as a bot on en:, despite not being approved. I think there is a case for blocking it until it gets approval. Secretlondon (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've partially blocked them from article space. Either this is a unapproved bot, or it is a username violation. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 20:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Salvio giuliano Since it is actually a bot that has the bot flag on multiple other wikis wouldnt't it be more disruptive to those wikis if we make them change the name? Nobody (talk) 11:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Secretlondon, I agree. I am somewhat on the fence here, but only because the account is so old... As far as I'm concerned, the username violation is clear and WP:EXEMPTBOT does not apply in this case, because that policy does not deal with usernames, whereas WP:BOTNAME does. — Salvio giuliano 11:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- If we are not going to block them I think we need to keep watching them as I expect they will edit without the bot flag. Secretlondon (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Niggzieboy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why is it offensive? Are you presuming it's a racial slur? Secretlondon (talk) 21:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's clearly a COI as they admit to be editing on behalf of the person they are writing about. Secretlondon (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maskip0079 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. "MAS is an organization..." from userpage. Air on White (talk) 07:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- MAS also seems to be a story, not a real thing. Does kip0079 represent an individual? It's not a username issue IMO. Secretlondon (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thomaslite (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any connection between this username and the entity they were promoting. Am I wrong, Vanderwaalforces? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Justlettersandnumbers See Google and especially https://github.com/MathieuGuillout/ThomasLite Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's the GitHub page for a slide template? Secretlondon (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Secretlondon perhaps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is just irritating. Secretlondon (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Secretlondon Ah, I’m sorry if it (my reply?) is irritating (to you?). I trust your judgement that it is not a blatant username policy violation. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is just irritating. Secretlondon (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Secretlondon perhaps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's the GitHub page for a slide template? Secretlondon (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Justlettersandnumbers See Google and especially https://github.com/MathieuGuillout/ThomasLite Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any connection between this username and the entity they were promoting. Am I wrong, Vanderwaalforces? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. Secretlondon (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- St. Baldrick's Foundation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. The account is old but has a clear conflict of interest with St. Baldrick's Foundation. Annh07 (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 15:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've left them a COI template but it's too old to action as a username. Secretlondon (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. Secretlondon (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Heatherhortonart (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. This user probably means well, their edits haven't been disruptive *but* take a look at the user name and consider that their edits have only been to the article "Heather Horton". Shearonink (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 19:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cullen328 (talk) 20:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Polish syco (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Polish psycho?. Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Or sicko? Or a company? Nothing much here. Secretlondon (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 21:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- WaluigiNut069 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Sexual username. "Nut" and "69" are not individually enough to block, but in combination they are. Air on White (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. This is unclear enough that it should be handled via discussion. They seem to me to be indicating that they are a fan of the Nintendo character Waluigi; they put 069, not 69, and not every use of 69 refers to the position. Edits are productive. 331dot (talk) 06:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Youflixtv (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnnie Bob (talk) 03:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Cosstudios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. As per the contributions made regarding 'Cos Checks' at James Buchanan. Agent 007 (talk) 07:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- HeyStripes (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Adding promo links at Refcam. Agent 007 (talk) 08:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Agent VII Isn't this a clear case of WP:USERSTAGENAME which would not be a violation? Nobody (talk) 08:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Promisevinay (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. Engaged in promoting of 'Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA)' in user-space. Agent 007 (talk) 08:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Roarart (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Only edit by this account is refspam to roarmartialartsfitness.com. . soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Canablueairways (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spammy sandbox . Wikishovel (talk) 10:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Asianinstitutions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User has submitted Draft:Asian Institute of Management and Technology (AIMT Guwahati) about an organisation whose website domain name is the same as the username, so clearly connected. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Do you think we should because it best if we do extend projected (blue lock with e) since now conservative media like New York Post are calling him far left which he is not necessarily what his views are or attacking him harshly just for simple or not that smart mistakes. So, to prevent vandalism and bias, it is best that we protect the article. 174.135.36.220 (talk) 04:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of edits and reverts about his expected retirement 45BearsFan (talk) 04:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The article was created by an undisclosed paid editor and was draftified but it was recently moved to the main namespace by a spa after gaining the autoconfirmed status. Since it include paid edits and was created in a violation of WP:PAID this must go through the AfC process. GSS 💬 04:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: Technically it has only been recreated once, if at all, as I can find no deletions....it's more a moving back and forth from main to draftspace. PAID also doesn't forbid users to create pages or modify them, they just need to declare themselves. Lectonar (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range edit-warring to insert preferred text. DonIago (talk) 05:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Zingo156 (talk) 06:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Speculative portfolios without citations are being heavily added by IPs. Temporary semi protection at-least for 2 days is requested. Thewikizoomer (talk) 09:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Insertion of copyvio content and WP:MEMORIAL violations leading into an edit war Borgenland (talk) 09:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by multiple sockpuppet accounts. Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Documentation subpage should be edited by anyone. Vitaium (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Are you sure you're in the right section? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)- Note: The page is currently template protected, so extended confirmed would indeed be a decrease. Favonian (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Frietjes: Notifying protecting admin per bright and yellow, yet so easily overlooked, instruction at the top of this section. Favonian (talk) 15:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell: protected it, I just moved it (not an admin). Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
please update the sources for [12] and [13].
13: https://web.archive.org/web/20161101205623/http://www.briannawu.net/about
Im not afraid (talk) 04:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I posted an edit request on the talk page there to look at this one. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
At present we have "On 24 May, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must immediately halt its Rafah offensive.[1]"
I suggest changing it to include a longer, semantically-complete, quotation, to read: "On 24 May, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must immediately halt its military offensive, and any other action in the Rafah governorate, which may inflict on the Palestinian group in Gaza conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.[2]"
As the Guardian article points out, and reports judges as arguing, the last comma is critical to the meaning of the ruling. Hunc (talk) 10:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "ICJ orders Israel to halt its offensive on Rafah, Gaza in new ruling". Al Jazeera. 2024-05-24. Retrieved 2024-05-24.
- ^ How a single comma is allowing Israel to question ICJ Rafah ruling. Israel is among those arguing that international court of justice directive is ambivalent and far from a blanket order to halt its offensive. Patrick Wintour, diplomatic editor. The Guardian. Wed 29 May 2024 https://www.theguardian.com/global/article/2024/may/29/how-a-single-comma-is-allowing-israel-to-question-icj-rafah-ruling
5* Dipblak (talk) 06:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC) |
| 7 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 09:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I have created over 120 articles (over 40 since 2023) on various STEM-related subjects, several of them received thanks from others and very few have so far had issues. My focus is on STEM-related biographies, concepts, or entities, with sufficient reference links. All my new articles are in the English Wikipedia, but I also do minor edits on factual information in other languages. I'm requesting autopatroller rights in the English Wikipedia to reduce the workload of other editors in reviewing my articles. VaudevillianScientist (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Very good sourced new articles. Very low error rate. Searches in original literature, finds details I never expected to make available for Wikipedia. Creates important, very unique, very useful encyclopaedic articles. Florentyna (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
@Ryan shell has suggested me to request autopatrol rights. I'm often creating simple articles about beetles in English (from the groups I'm personally already familiar with or learning about) and later expanding them if the existing resources allow me to do so. This is to allow other people to find this information and pictures more easily (otherwise it's often scattered on the internet and hard to find). I'm requesting autopatroller rights because I create large batches of articles at once, as Ryan mentioned. I only use reliable sources to provide information for Wikipedia Ipscaij (talk) 09:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I would like to have autowikibrowser rights to speed up edits that are too slow when done manually. I work with {{infobox company}} articles and would like to use AWB for speeding up edits that would take way too long to edit manually. WiinterU 00:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have autowikibrowser permissions to make editing faster to make Wikipedia better. CGP05 (talk) 00:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Patrolling certain deprecated/GUNREL sources. JoelleJay (talk) 03:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC) I became aware of AWB on WikiProject Check Wikipedia while helping on fixing errors via Toolforge. I do have over 400 non-automated edits. I want to use AWB to continue my error fixing work more fast. |
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Dear Wiki Administrators, Over the last few days, I drafted, created, and edited (with very minimal help from other users) the entire 2024 Ohio State University pro-Palestine campus protests article. I am in the process of making significant updates to this article because I have lots of information about the events I would like to add and many sources I have not yet added. I also have contacts who are sending me media, including photos and videos they've taken at the event (with copyright permission), to upload to this article. A Wikipedia Administrator recently made this article Extended Protected. I am very glad that they did this, because I was worried about the potential of vandalism on this article. However, this Wikipedia account no longer qualifies for editing this article because I created this account recently. As a result, in order to streamline my ability to quickly make changes, I would like to request that this account is whitelisted to edit this article. Please let me know if this will be possible. Thank you for your help and contributions! Onlineone22 (talk) 01:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
Trial ends June 16, and backlog drive is nearly over. I am reapplying early since some requests may not be answered after two weeks from now. I would like to review more pages and hopefully clear down the backlog. I have reviewed more than 100 articles so far and only very few were unreviewed. Please consider my reviews and AfDs before processing my application. ToadetteEdit! 18:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
I've been active in the NPP BACKLOG and the NEW PAGE FEED and I noticed that the Backlog keep increasing every single day, I really wish to help reduce it even though I can't do it all, and each time I'm here I promise to dedicate my time to the New page feeds and also stick to the policies. Thanks in advance. 75DD (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello there. I am a long standing user with a good handle on guidelines and policy. I have taken part in AFDs, more recently improving articles to standards which resulted in them being kept. Elsewhere I have improved new articles that on first glance do not meet GNG but looking BEFORE I have found sources for improvement. So I think I am fair with new content. I also create many new articles, which are now automatically accepted but not everyone has this luxury. I recently became aware of this backlog and I would like to help. Rain the 1 21:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I’ve been an editor for 2 years and I’ve worked on different articles and have also been able to review some articles, I will love to be granted this right so I can reduce back logs and make things easier for other reviewers, can I be granted one month trial? Madeforall1 (talk) 00:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Was granted a 2 month trial which expires on the 26th of June, hope I'm not jumping the gun by submitting this now (but I'm liable to forget and be surprised later). Submitted 78 reviews during the recent backlog drive and am enjoying the methodical rhythm of AFD + NPP. Would like permanent access. BrigadierG (talk) 00:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm interested in participating in reviewing articles related to music, people, films, and companies pending in the New pages feed backlog. I have been active in NPP and New pages feed, carefully reviewing notability and WP:BEFORE. Has good knowledge of notability guidelines. I would love to request a 3-month trial run. Thanks! Additionally; Recently identified a suspected case of WP:UPE. After thoroughly analyzing the user's activities, I reported the issue, resulting in their indefinite ban. Here; User Page 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 19:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting for pending changes reviewer rights so that I can review pending changes. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
I have made some very high quality articles (Aston Martin DB9 FA and Aston Martin Rapide at FAC) so I am very familiar with what content is reliable and what is not. I have reverted vandalism (in fact, reverting vandalism was the first edit I made) and whenever i seen vandalism, I take extreme pride in reverting it. Best 750h+ 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
I have watched listed several article that have been protected as "pending changes" such as Charizard and Woody (Toy Story) and I would love to have an option to accept their edits if its constructive. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I think I have a decent understanding of Wikipedia's policies. I've monitored recent changes and have mostly reverted vandalism whenever I see it, trying my best to always warn them. I think that being a pending changes reviewer will help me continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. GoldRomean (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I have been registered for some time now and have recently gotten into more regular editing and monitoring of recent changes and pages that come up in publicity or news to check for currency and any wayward or malicious edits or mistakes. I have a good understanding (and am always learning and improving) of the basic and relevant policies for pending changes reviewer permission. I'd love to help make Wikipedia a better place for everyone by supporting pending reviews! Whisky and more (talk) 11:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I participate routinely on both AFD and AFC, I edit routinely, and I have over 1,300 edits. I reverted some edits in my user history. TheNuggeteer (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia articles. I have been an active editor for almost 3 years, with over 16,000 edits. My contributions reflect a solid understanding of Wikipedia's content policies, including verifiability, neutrality, and no original research. I regularly engage in discussions to improve articles. I am committed to ensuring that pending changes are reviewed promptly and accurately. M S Hassan (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! I'm requesting Pending changes reviewer so I can review changes. I have read Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes and the other pages to read (such as WP:VANDALISM and WP:COPYRIGHT), and I have been fighting vandalism for about 2 months now. Having this user right will help me reduce the number of articles listed at Special:PendingChanges. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Hello! I'd like to have rollback rights to revert vandalism quickly. I usually use Twinkle to revert vandalism, but with rollback rights, it will be much faster in the blink of an eye. I've been seeing vandalism occur more frequently for some reason when I look at the "recent changes" logs. I want to help fight off vandalism. It's okay if I don't get it, but I want to have an opportunity to help out. GoodHue291 (talk) 23:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
I have met the criteria for requesting access to this tool, and most of my edits to Wikipedia have been reverting and warning. I am very familiar with what constitutes a rollback, and have been using other tools, such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet for a couple months. Looking to get back into Wikipedia, and would love to gain access to this tool. Edit: I should have included that I am interested in switching to AntiVandal, and that is why I am interested in this tool. OnlyNano 19:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights to assist in combating vandalism more efficiently. Over the past several months, I have actively reverted vandalism, I would like to have rollback permissions so that I can revert vandalism faster. I have taken feedback from my previous request seriously and have since ensured to warn users after reverting their edits, including good faith edits. Granting me rollback rights will enable me to help maintain the integrity of Wikipedia more effectively. M S Hassan (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I have been reverting vandalism using UltraViolet for a while (quite a bit last year and getting back into it now), and I meet the criteria for rollback permissions. I would like to have rollback permissions to use Huggle or AntiVandal to revert vandalism faster. Totalirus (talk) 23:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm active mostly on WP:BLPN and sometimes have to revert problem editors' deeper edits or find the pre-problem version of a BLP manually. I use Twinkle, which has the rollback feature built-in. I've edited responsibly enough over almost 19 years to have never had a sanction or block. Thank you for your consideration. JFHJr (㊟) 01:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC) Addendum: my track record of warning editors appears in BLPN archives, though I rarely template user pages especially when there's an active BLPN discussion that would make doing so unhelpful, antagonistic, and redundant. Thanks again! JFHJr (㊟) 01:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |