Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2010-04-05

Comments

The following is an automatically-generated compilation of all talk pages for the Signpost issue dated 2010-04-05. For general Signpost discussion, see Wikipedia talk:Signpost.

Features and admins: This week in approvals (905 bytes · 💬)

← Back to 2010-04-05

Discuss this story

• Urgh! Featured pictures with insects are usual stuff, but there are so many of them this week! Kayau Voting IS evil 03:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
• Before this edition of the Signpost was published, Polargeo was promoted administrator, but it says no admins were promoted. NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 13:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

In the news: Wikipedia influences drug terminology, brief headlines (1,758 bytes · 💬)

← Back to 2010-04-05

Discuss this story

Interestingly, the term was added to Urban Dictionary the same day as it was added to Wikipedia.[1] Lampman (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Shame the media blame Wikipedia for everything without even paying attention to the facts. --Yowuza yadderhouse | meh 16:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm thrilled with Rob Weir's little Wikipedia suckage experiment. Finally someone is able to convey what we've been telling people for years: We're not trying to be the only source of information for a subject, we're trying to be a good starting block from which readers can find more detailed information on their own. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 17:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The comments in the PR agency's post about Wikipedia are also worth a read - it appears that some agencies have gotten burnt by promising their clients an article only for it to be deleted or to be edited to contain stuff the client would rather keep quiet. Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

By the way, that article has also been discussed on Wikien-l: PR consultants: perhaps Wikipedia is not the ideal promotional medium. Regards, HaeB (talk) 11:54, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos (2,444 bytes · 💬)

← Back to 2010-04-05

Discuss this story

• The April Fools' statements this year were great. Keep it up, whoever-does-those-things! :D ALI ^{nom nom} 01:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I agree it's great! By the way, a little insignificant, I think all the people at DYK, TFA, etc, do that. Kayau Voting IS evil 03:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Kudos to them, then. ALI ^{nom nom} 13:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

A P.S. about the next Board meeting: Foundation:Meetings still lists no past or planned meetings since last November (the page was last edited on 29 October 2009), but a few hours before I wrote that the date of the next meeting hadn't been published yet, someone from Wikimedia Germany indicated that it will be held on April 17-18.

Minutes are usually published for each meeting, but it seems none have been written for the meetings held after last August.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC) fixed link HaeB (talk) 19:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

The "Howcast" intro to WP is just soooo professional. Well done, whoever produced it. The English subtitled translation to the Italian vid on WP needs a little tightening up. Tony (talk) 11:59, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

It was nice. I did notice, though, that after clicking to create "Mount erebus", the article actually created was "Mount Erebus" (with the name in caps)! --Auntof6 (talk) 13:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup (847 bytes · 💬)

← Back to 2010-04-05

Discuss this story

• There aren't 33,000 articles, categories, templates etc seem to have been included in the mainspace count YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 03:28, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

• As in previous issues of the Report, we tend to include all the pages under the purview of a project in our total just for simplicity's sake. If you exclude everything except mainspace articles and lists, the number of encyclopedic articles covered by WP Baseball is over 26,000, which is still an impressive number. -Mabeenot (talk) 07:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)