Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/GF-FMR

Comments

In the section "Benefits to participants" both of the sentences end with the word practice though I think different meanings are intended for each. To the reader, it is just a tad bit distracting. I suggest a different wording. Biosthmors (talk) 05:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Targets

Per these rubrics:

WikiProject Medicine assessment statistics Medicine articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 7 13 20 21 61 FL 2 3 8 13 FM 74 74 GA 30 49 109 175 1 364 B 58 432 1,309 1,701 29 3,529 C 4 424 3,149 7,526 112 11,215 Start 141 4,576 17,678 1 300 22,696 Stub 1,626 9,993 5 453 12,077 List 23 267 538 9 14 851 Category 1 2 3 9,674 9,680 Disambig 1 170 171 File 478 478 Portal 540 540 Project 168 168 Redirect 19 437 810 5,824 7,090 Template 1 1 3 1,658 1,663 NA 1 5 2 8 Draft 9 264 273 Assessed 99 1,105 11,500 38,471 18,867 909 70,951 Unassessed 12 12 Total 99 1,105 11,500 38,471 18,867 921 70,963 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 242,123 Ω = 4.85 worklist • log • category

Translation task force assessment statistics WikiProject Medicine Translation Task Force articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 3 5 8 GA 24 15 39 B 2 150 2 154 C 1 73 1 2 2 79 Start 7 1 8 Stub 1 1 Category 4 4 Project 1 2 3 Assessed 31 250 3 3 6 3 296 Total 31 250 3 3 6 3 296 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 902 Ω = 3.12 worklist • log • category

I recommend linking certain groups as targets. Currently there are 21 top importance C-class articles, 63 high importance stub-class articles, 284 high importance start-class articles, and 183 high importance C-class articles. While these assignments aren't perfect, they are the best way we have to point out high priority content. Biosthmors (talk) 06:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

I added these links (without the numbers) to the target article links section. Biosthmors (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)