Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Membership/News/2018 Annual Report
Thank you to all who contributed to this report. Very informative. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Poorly formed articles edit
I have begun rejecting unsourced stubby articles from copyediting. They are subject to deletion and not worth anyone's time. We have so much more to do. Lfstevens (talk) 22:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Many editors seem to mistake other woes for the need for copy-editing, or they choose the wrong template, but at least the articles get dealt with at some level, and hopefully shunted towards the correct maintenance area. Thanks for your sterling work here, LFstevens. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 00:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Lfstevens, I agree with Baffle gab here. It's important work to do especially to help the noobs like me. PopularOutcasttalk2me! 00:19, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Congrats! edit
Congrats to the whole team. Amazing work! Special acknowledgment to Twofingered Typist for making the hall of fame: the amount and quality of work you do is inspiring. PopularOutcasttalk2me! 22:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
PopularOutcast Thank you!! Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you edit
A big thank you to all those who put the report together. Fascinating stuff. I became enthralled going through just what GOCE had done last year. An impressive, even amazing, testimony to what it has managed to do. We can't be far off some sort of theoretical minimum 
. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)