Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Task template

Beanotown

I notice Beanotown is listed in the 'Expand' bit. Thing is, there's nothing really to expand. It's just a town that's occasionally mentioned in the Beano, no huge backstory or anything. BillyH 06:44, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Templates

Should we be adding cleanup templates to the articles listed here? We could design new ones that link directly to this template. --Chris Griswold 14:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Character Status/Relatives Section

I don't know who's dumb (sorry but that's the truth) idea was to remove the "Status" (e.g. active/deceased/depowered) and the "Relatives" from the heroes' characteristics. It was really a nice thing and was helping and "making it the picture" clear.

If many people think it is spoiling in some sort of way (which is not), they should reconsider in my opinion. And if the final decision is to keep it that way, there ATLEAST should be an artical about the status/relatives of everyone.

Yes, I agree. Having current status of the 'hero in the characteristics is a very helpfull feature. But relatives should not be in it. Unless the relative is a 'hero. Dracoster (talk) 13:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Collaboration

THis was a very smart addition to this list. --Chris Griswold 01:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! (insert humble blushing icon here) Fram 12:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Image requests

For the illustrators, do you want a picture of their work or of the actuall person. I have added pictures of their work onto their article, but i am not sure if I should take it off the request list.Phoenix741 02:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

OHOTMU?

I've looked all over, and can't find a reason that this information would need to be removed from articles. Can someone please clarify for me? TheKnightlyOne (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Cultural impact of Wonder Woman

I've initiated discussion in Talk: Cultural impact of Wonder Woman, and would really welcome some feedback on the discussion topics I've initiated there. I'd like to have some consensus before proceeding with some overhauling of the article. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2011 (UTC)