Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abandoned Articles

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 多多123 in topic JUDUCA

WikiProject iconAbandoned Articles
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of the Abandoned Articles WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve visitation to abandoned articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconOrphanage
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject OrphanageYou can help!.

Welcome to the WikiProject Abandoned Articles talk page.

October 2007 newsletter for WikiProject Abandoned Articles edit

Welcome edit

The WikiProject welcomes two new members in the past three months:

Progress edit

The WikiProject is now halfway done, numerically, with the 1000 articles identified in December 2006. The first (oldest) 500 articles have been claimed, reviewed, and (when needed, which was almost all cases) improved. Moreover, given the passage of time, many of articles 501 through 1000 have been worked on by other editors (it's ten months since that list was generated). So reviewing the second half of the 1000 articles should be easier.

A slightly different approach edit

Section 6 (articles 501 through 600 on the list) has been organized differently than the previous five sections. First, blocks are (roughly) five articles each, rather than 10, making it easier for you to claim and finish a block. Second, perhaps more importantly, each block consists of similar pages; if you're interested in fixing disambiguation pages, there are blocks of those; if you're interested in articles (which is what the project originally started out being), there are blocks of those; and there is one block of lists and one of redirects (mostly redirects to articles). So, fewer surprises this time when you claim a block.

In addition, since the project now has 25 active members (though some are likely inactive), having more blocks will make it easier to spread the editing around.

Inactivating your membership edit

If you received this newsletter on your user talk page and don't want to receive such postings in the future, please move your name, in the participants section of the WikiProject, to the "Inactive" subsection.

About this newsletter edit

This newsletter is being delivered by Anibot; it was written by John Broughton. Please post any comments about it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abandoned Articles, in a section separate from the newsletter itself.

A new newsletter directory is out! edit

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Anyone out there? edit

Is this project still alive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starman2377 (talkcontribs) 18:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Starman2377: Indeed it is, although our efforts are not centralised as one may expect with most WikiProjects. UaMaol (talk) 07:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bastille Day event listed at Requested moves edit

 

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bastille Day event to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

JUDUCA edit

JUDUCA is a Wikipedia/Wikimedia page which was abandoned prior to 2016, it requires a whole article being written and actualization to be realized on its pages. Please take this into consideration before copy editing or looking for citations on different pages. 多多123 (talk) 13:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply