Wikipedia talk:Whacking with a wet trout

WikiProject iconDepartment of Fun Project‑class Bottom‑importance
WikiProject iconThis page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
BottomThis page has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale.

Whack? edit

I thought that is supposed to be slap!. --Edokter (Talk) 16:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

/me slaps Soms around a bit with a large trout
Mode +b !Slapper*@* by Soms

Wow, for some reason the word "wikitrout" just makes me giggle. :-D --Iamunknown 16:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

God-Emperors edit

You do realise that the God Emperor of Dune was half-trout, don't you?? Are we sure we want to go down this road? :P The Land 12:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

What are you talking about?? He was half worm! mathwhiz29 03:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Origin link edit

Would I be correct in presuming that this expression derives from The Fish-Slapping Dance? If so, I find it hard to believe that we don't have a link yet. Newyorkbrad 21:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I had the same reaction. -Phoenixrod 03:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

What ... edit

What the hell is this all about? ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 11:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

*whack* Shii (tock) 07:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Meaning what? Adjust downwards or away from topic? Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 08:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
{{whale}} Realfakebezalbob (talk) 01:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
man life is hard Realfakebezalbob (talk) 01:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 If you give this user a "Wet Trout Award", they will simply eat the trout.

Abuse of namespace. edit

This is not funny. This abuse of the namespace should be deleted and the perpetrators punished. This should be a Christ-blessed article, and NOT A STUB, if Scientizzle is going to link to it from press releases. I hope you enjoyed your nice inside joke, turkeys, because now you look asinine. I hope it was worth it. 76.247.104.56 (talk) 02:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It most definitely was. GeeJo (t)(c) • 19:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Do you think they should get Wikiminnowed for a sense of humour failure? —Vanderdeckenξφ 20:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I do not see any "humour" in this projectpage. Looks rather pathetic and childish. Billlogalneedslove (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Consider posting a deletion discussion at WP:AfD. Dragon 280 (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don't_be_a_dick. Just saying.

???? edit

4DJONG (talk) 22:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)-This is a little offensive really!!!! I don't know what this is about!!!!Reply

It's for people who know each other well enough on Wikipedia that they can tease each other publicly for making rather stupid mistakes. I believe the first use of it was when an admin accidentally deleted the main page. Bob the Wikipedian (talkcontribs) 16:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

? edit

"Clue levels"? Koro Neil (talk) 16:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

You really don't have a clue do you? :) -- œ 23:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The conversations on this page are a great way to start the day...they are more effective than laughing gas... Bob the Wikipedian (talkcontribs) 17:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
That's why "clue" is a link. Click on it and learn about modern internet culture. some page -- TurtleBoy0 03:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
That link provides no real information. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 08:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Template edit

This isn't a template that you can put on someone's talk page, but the whack someone with a minnow page is. Should the trout be turned into a template to make it more consistent and to make it easier to hit people with it? some page -- TurtleBoy0 04:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

See {{troutme}}. -- œ 05:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cornhobble edit

Is this any relation to cornhobbling? Eeekster (talk) 05:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The trout is huge... edit

I would like an option to be troutslapped with an smaller trout. Troutalt is the right size, but lacks the simplicity of a simple "WHACK!" is favor of a long explanation about "Spreading the WikiFun." Guy Macon (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

There are minnows to be whacked with... or are those way too small? Aurora Illumina 02:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
I had to use a {{whale}} the other day   Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 03:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Minnow is not bad. A prefer the size of Troutalt but could live with Minnow. Alas, both alternatives lack the convenient troutslapping afforded by Template:troutme and Template:User trout. If you use either of those two trout-related templates, you are stuck with the huge trout. Guy Macon (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Colorado Wiknic edit

All Wikipedians are cordially invited to the Colorado celebration of the 2011 Great American Wiknic on June 25. We will meet Saturday afternoon from 3:00 to 5:00 at the D Note, 7519 Grandview Avenue in Arvada. Please e-mail Jacques Delaguerre at Special:EmailUser/Jaxdelaguerre if you plan to attend. Be there or be square! –  Buaidh  19:17, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move (2012) edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:17, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


Wikipedia:Whacking with a Wet TroutWikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout – Per WP:NCCAPS. How serious am I about this? I'm really not sure. --BDD (talk) 17:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Support Policies like Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization) may seem to be trivial, but consistent naming not only looks more professional, it makes like easier to any program that is searching Wikipedia. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Support while it may not be "necessary" it's in line with naming conventions, no reason not to. --kelapstick(bainuu) 00:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment this isn't an article, so NCCAPS doesn't apply. That being said, either way works. And if we were to look 'professional', we should be using title case. -- 70.24.250.110 (talk) 11:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Seeing as BDD whacked me with a wet trout in a recent move discussion I think I should agree with him. How serious am I about this? I have no idea either! Zarcadia (talk) 02:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Yes, do it! (I mean, rename the article, not...) CsDix (talk) 00:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. One does become accustomed to the title-naming convention for articles in Wikipedia; so, in the Wikipedia policy documents, one would instinctually expect the same. Do I know what I am talking about? Sadly, no, but I thought I should weigh in (on the Wet Trout) as it is a weighty issue deserving of at least one iota of my attention. Go ahead, slap away if you feel I need an adjustment to my clue level. As of this moment, I am none the wiser about the issue in question, but I support the motion. --Skol fir (talk) 21:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Completely Indifferent, Couldn't Care Less but please leave the resulting redirect for those of us who have a sense of harmless fun (and for existing links of course). Note however that Template:R from other capitalisation is not applicable here. Andrewa (talk) 06:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Supermarket worker in Lancashire "breamed" edit

"Irish girl sought after fish-slapping incident in Lancashire". BBC News Online. 25 February 2014. Police in England are searching for an Irish teenager who is said to have slapped a shop worker across the face with a large fish.

Andy Dingley (talk) 11:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Minnow upgrades edit

I've upgraded {{Minnow}} to support different alignments, floating to the left or right (e.g. to attach it to a talk page post without disrupting the page), and arbitrary CSS styling.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  01:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Template:Trout up for deletion edit

{{trout}} has been nominated for deletion by someone -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 05:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

It's older than 1995 edit

At University we had a similar "slap with a wet fish" emote on our text-based MUD at University of Leeds in 1991 and I dare say it was around before then on green screens. I think the early MUDs started in the 1970's. It was possible to play online between UK universities using UNIX commands to make the login. Emotes were like an early form of emoji. Maybe this counts as "Original Research" as I am one of those originally around before the www went live in 1993. :-) Oh, and this smiley is just as old too. David Crayford  19:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Epic trouting battle edit

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Look at my talk page. There was an epic trouting battle. TigerScientist Chat 16:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Slap! edit

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

BAM Caldwmic002 (talk) 23:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

 

Plip!

Related external link edit

[1]. Enjoy! --Tryptofish (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

More descriptive template? edit

I'm thinking of making the trout templates more descriptive by having the ability for the templates themselves to tell who whacked you and why, instead of having the user explain themselves in a separate message. I've already made these modifications to the versions of the trout templates ported over to Uncyclopedia. What do you think? ARandomPage, the named space (Update them!) (Stuff they do) 03:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

template test 2 edit

  Right! Stop that!
It's far too silly!
Don't take this too seriously. Another user just wants you to know something you said crosses their boundaries of sensibility.

92.24.83.192 (talk) 10:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wasn't "Wet Trout Slap" done earlier? edit

1979-1985 i was heavy into BBS's and i was sure i had slapped a couple before i went homeless... after my TRaSh-80 was "stolen" (get out... can't carry it? Boo Hoo!) didn't replace access until IRC was invented so decades may have clouded my mind but if my life had depended on it I'd have sworn it existed before 1986 AD Qazwiz (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply