Questions edit

1. What happens if someone wishes to provide private feedback on a public request? sonia 02:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I believe you should send a message to Online-ambassadors-en lists.wikimedia.org, but I'd wait for Sage to confirm this. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, that's a good way to go. That one goes to the Online Ambassadors selection team.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 04:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


2. The "How to apply" section of this page contains the word "transclude". That's not too clever. I don't know what that means, and I don't want anyone to tell me. I want an ordinary word to be used. Jargon like this will be, I'm afraid, off-putting, and I'll wager good money that that's not the intention here. Tom Cloyd (talk) 03:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Interim Application Process since there is no existing one. edit

Ever since the dissolution of the Steering Committee, there has been no one responsible for receiving online ambassador applications. That is, with the advent of - and transition to - Education Working Group strategy there was a neglect to create a new process for online ambassador applications. At the first IRC meeting of the Working Group, received no objections to create a temporary solution. So here is what I am implementing instead, until there are objections.

Here are the changes I've made to make things run: Offline applictions are no longer allowed. Online applications occur by posting the questionaire on a new section on the page Wikipedia talk:Online Ambassadors. Online ambassadors are accepted once 2 endorsements are made on their application. Maximilianklein (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I suggest, "Online ambassadors are accepted once their application has been open for at least 2 weeks, at least 2 votes in favor are made by other editors, and at least 66% of all votes are in favor." Pine 06:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply