Wikipedia talk:Notability sub-pages

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Father Goose in topic Important Notice
WikiProject iconEssays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Important Notice

edit

This page is currently a rough draft. It is intended to be an guideline essay on when/how to create notability sub-pages, and what they should and shouldn't contain. The authors believe that this isn't an example of WP:CREEP, as discussions have shown a need for better control over the creation of notability sub-pages (in order to prevent instruction creep). Note that the concepts in this guideline have already been recently implemented in notability sub-pages such as WP:BIO.

Contributions to this page are welcome, but please read the following discussions first:


WP:CREEP. — aldebaer⁠ ] 15:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Have you actually read it? I know that most editors will agree with the actual content of the proposal, but if enough people think it still constitutes instruction creep, then I'll change it to an essay. That way it can still be referenced, but it isn't subject to WP:CREEP. I trust you don't have an objection to that? —gorgan_almighty 07:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Request for comment

edit

An guideline essay on when and when not to create notability sub-pages, and what they should and shouldn't contain. Discussions have shown a need for better control over the creation of notability sub-pages (in order to prevent instruction creep). Note that the concepts in this guideline have already been implemented in notability sub-pages such as WP:BIO.

Relevant discussions include:

gorgan_almighty 10:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply