Wikipedia talk:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day
Latest comment: 6 months ago by 75.117.226.44 in topic Comments moved from the essay page
 | Essays Low‑impact  | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Comments moved from the essay page
edit
The comments below were moved from the essay page to this talk page by DesertPipeline (talk) 14:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC) So a block isn't a block, and a ban isn't a ban, they're just whatever the blocked or banned contributor feels like abiding by? Cabayi (talk) 11:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Well, blocks and bans exist for a reason, and of course action should be taken against editors in violation of their block/ban. I just think that nuking all their contributions for no other reason than the fact they were made in violation of a block/ban, is counterproductive. The good edits they make are good edits regardless of their author. It comes off as a bit of a WP:BATHWATER thing. PrussianOwl (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- It's a WP:DENY thing. Cabayi (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that only be if we kept their disruptive changes? PrussianOwl (talk) 02:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Stop using acronyms And actually refer to your reasons 75.117.226.44 (talk) 02:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Wouldn't that only be if we kept their disruptive changes? PrussianOwl (talk) 02:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)