Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biology
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Biology and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | Biology Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
 | There is a discussion in the archive of a consensus how scientific names are displayed in the lead of species articles listed under common names. |
Potential significant change to species notability
editOver on Wikipedia talk:Notability, several editors are working on a draft proposal to replace our current notability guidelines for species (all species are notable) with something much more restrictive (only species that go beyond certain limited pieces of information would be allowed their own articles). If you have opinions on this issue, now would be a good time to weigh in there. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Also now at Village Pump (Policy): Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Species_notability Crossroads -talk- 01:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi guys, can you help me combine the two phylogenetic trees? Thanks, Wolverine XI (talk to me) 08:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Nature has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)