Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of San Francisco/Oral and Written Communication Section 17 (Fall 2016)

This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Oral and Written Communication Section 17
Institution
University of San Francisco
Instructor
Leigh Meredith
Wikipedia Expert
Ian (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Rhetoric, Composition, Speech
Course dates
2016-08-24 00:00:00 UTC – 2016-12-18 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
20


Oral and Written Communication Sections 17 and 18

Student Assigned Reviewing
Amy Lainez Dean Buonomano
Afvasquez
Lingjian Fan "Shang Huo" (Excessive Internal Heat)
Mk edwards Rules for a Knight User:Rxabdallah/sandbox
Aasherian Reform Judaism User:Trawdarula/sandbox
Jarosas2 Nuevo Cine Mexicano
CATRHET130 Barbara Köhler
Tmontford Discrimination against people with HIV/AIDS User:Marilyn Narloch/sandbox
Sophiahedgecock Zazie User:Efitzpatrick1413/sandbox
TaylorSwiftyBoot Fillmore District, San Francisco User:Acarmona124/sandbox
Reikosimmons History of enslavement of indigenous peoples in California, Unisex public toilet
Cmsaunders0906
Jennaheer San Francisco Bay Area Street Art
Malikaih Japanese Fashion (Traditional)
Heidiwarde Stockholm Syndrome User:Aasherian/sandbox
Ljperales Shyima Hall
Egabeckert
Gavindeng5 Malcolm W. Klein
AlexisElena
Fiona161
UrAznBoi Babaylan User:Tmontford/sandbox
Dana-Lis Bittner Daniel Glattauer
Trawdarula Themes of Christianity in Hip Hop and Rap Music User:Heidiwarde/sandbox
Nikolasbrady The Fireman (band) Rules for a Knight
Rjquezon Eddie Aikau
Sstrayer23 Coral Reef Death and Restoration, Coral reef protection
Acarmona124 Olvera Street User:TaylorSwiftyBoot/sandbox
AnneSal User:Bjones9/sandbox
Olivervail Paul Delaroche User:Dana-Lis Bittner/sandbox
Apiazza97 Napa County wine
Marilyn Narloch Core Strengthening User:UrAznBoi/sandbox
Rxabdallah User:Nikolasbrady/sandbox
Dkim38 Father Damien
Efitzpatrick1413 Mt. Tom User:Sophiahedgecock/sandbox
Pcolina Active Design User:Pcolina/sandbox
Bjones9 User:Olivervail/sandbox

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Monday, 26 September 2016   |   Wednesday, 28 September 2016   |   Friday, 30 September 2016
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Assignment - Practicing the basics
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings
Monday, 3 October 2016   |   Wednesday, 5 October 2016   |   Friday, 7 October 2016
Assignment - Critique an article

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Choose an article, and consider some questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
  • Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.
In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 10 October 2016   |   Wednesday, 12 October 2016   |   Friday, 14 October 2016
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.

Week 4

Course meetings
Wednesday, 19 October 2016   |   Friday, 21 October 2016
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?
Assignment - Choose possible topics
  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Choose 3–5 potential articles that you can tackle, and post links to them on your Wikipedia user page. For articles that already exist, check the Talk page to see what other Wikipedians might be doing. Finally, present your choices to your instructor for feedback.

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 24 October 2016   |   Wednesday, 26 October 2016   |   Friday, 28 October 2016
Assignment - Finalize your topic / Find your sources
  • On the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.
Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 31 October 2016   |   Wednesday, 2 November 2016   |   Friday, 4 November 2016
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  • Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review, and then assign them to yourself in the Review column.
  • Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 7

Course meetings
Monday, 7 November 2016   |   Wednesday, 9 November 2016   |   Friday, 11 November 2016
Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions.

Week 8

Course meetings
Monday, 14 November 2016   |   Wednesday, 16 November 2016   |   Friday, 18 November 2016
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!

Creating a new article?

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.

Week 9

Course meetings
Monday, 21 November 2016   |   Wednesday, 23 November 2016
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Milestones