Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Husson University/PT Management of Children with Neurological Dysfunction (Fall)

This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
PT Management of Children with Neurological Dysfunction
Institution
Husson University
Instructor
Karen Huhn
Wikipedia Expert
Ian (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Pediatrics
Course dates
2017-09-07 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-12-15 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
36


In following PT 520, this course maintains the ICF focus on the child’s function and social context while expanding the focus on exploring evidence supporting PT services for children with neuromuscular disorders. In particular, this course will survey the literature for evidence that PT interventions can influence Prevention, Prediction, Plasticity, and Participation (the 4 P’s) for this pediatric population. With greater depth of knowledge about evidence, the student will develop entry-level skills of assessment and intervention planning for children with developmental disabilities. Multiple factors that contribute to decisions for prescribing family-based, clinic-based, and education-based models of intervention will be analyzed. Students will become familiar with evidence-based methods for addressing issues of strength and gait in the presence of atypical motor control; the impact of medical, surgical and orthotic interventions in modifying atypical motor control; and, a variety of assistive technology and durable medical equipment frequently seen in pediatric settings. In addition, students will be required to complete an online course and certification exam through the CDC on concussions in youth.

Student Assigned Reviewing
GR3GP1K3 Clubfoot Rhizotomy, Rett Syndrome
Halestorm18 Rhizotomy Torticollis, Rett Syndrome
Waterhouset Developmental Coordination Disorder Club foot, NIDCAP
Sjandreau17 Sensory processing disorder
Sharrow96 Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) Sensory Processing Disorder, Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Benholmes2209 NIDCAP
Sarah1124 Rhett's syndrome Sensory processing disorder, Developmental coordination disorder
Brookelabelle Idiopathic Toe Walking
Kplourde8 Juvenile idiopathic arthritis Rett Syndrome, Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Lee122013 Idiopathic Toe Walking Torticollis, Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Cushmank Rett Syndrome Special Olympics, Sensory processing disorder
Ianbauersfeld NIDCAP Developmental Coordination Disorder, Special Olympics
Msouza224 Clubfoot Clubfoot, Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Sensory processing disorder
Thibault110583 Juvenile idiopathic arthritis Juvenile idopathic arthritis, Special Olympics, Rhett's syndrome
Wacomer Rett Syndrome Rhizotomy, Sensory Processing Disorder
Rsnorton3 Developmental Coordination Disorder Rhizotomy, Clubfoot
Minardesgaio Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Sensory Processing Disorder, Developmental Coordination Disorder
AlexLamphear Rhizotomy
Cdoyon1 Torticollis Developmental Coordination Disorder, Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Kolby Arnold Sensory processing disorder Special Olympics, Rhizotomy
Glavinm Individualized education program
PeterBryant04 Individualized Education Plan
Morris116084 Special Olympics Sensory processing disorder, Chatham University
Hpeabody Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Sensory Processing Disorder, Rhizotomy
K8ecyr Idiopathic Toe Walking
SBerenyi4 Special Olympics Special Olympics, Rhizotomy, Torticollis
TaylorBuck15 Sensory Processing Disorder Sensory Processing Disorder
Codystgermain Special Olympics Rhizotomy, Torticollis
Hoodryan24 Rhizotomy
Midurap Developmental Coordination Disorder Juvenile ideopathic arthritis, Special olympics
Yieng Torticollis Developmental coordination disorder
Keith Beefe
Woodem Individualized Educational Plan Individualized Education Program
DLH2018 Special Olympics, Synactive Theory of Newborn Behavioral Organization and Development, Torticollis Torticollis
McGinnisb Developmental Coordination Disorder Rhizotomy, NIDCAP
Sukiennr

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Thursday, 7 September 2017
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings
Monday, 11 September 2017   |   Thursday, 14 September 2017
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
  • Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    • Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  • Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 18 September 2017   |   Thursday, 21 September 2017
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.

Week 4

Course meetings
Monday, 25 September 2017   |   Thursday, 28 September 2017
Assignment - Review the rules for medical topics

Review Wikipedia's rules for topics related to medicine, human health, and psychology.

Assignment - Best practices for working in groups
  • Make sure everyone in the group is assigned to the same Wikipedia article on the Students tab of this course page.
  • Select one group member whose Sandbox space you'll all share to draft your article. Each person should link to that shared Sandbox from their own Sandbox page. A sandbox is like any other page on Wikipedia, and anyone can edit it.
  • Wikipedia doesn't allow multiple people to edit from different devices at the same time. If you're working together in person, one person should add the work to the Sandbox. If you are all working independently, make small edits and save often to avoid "editing conflicts" with classmates. Make sure that you're logged in under your own Wikipedia account while editing in your classmate's sandbox to ensure your edits are recorded.
  • Don't create a group account for your project. Group accounts are prohibited.
Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.

  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Find an article from the list of "Available Articles" on the Articles tab on this course page. When you find the one you want to work on, click Select to assign it to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 2 October 2017   |   Thursday, 5 October 2017
Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 9 October 2017   |   Thursday, 12 October 2017
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  • Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign them to yourself to review.
  • Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 7

Course meetings
Monday, 16 October 2017   |   Thursday, 19 October 2017
Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions.

Week 8

Course meetings
Monday, 23 October 2017   |   Thursday, 26 October 2017
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' or 'Edit source' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.

Week 9

Course meetings
Monday, 30 October 2017   |   Thursday, 2 November 2017
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take the 'Contributing Images and Media Files' training before you upload an image.

Week 10

Course meetings
Monday, 6 November 2017   |   Thursday, 9 November 2017
Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 11

Course meetings
Monday, 13 November 2017   |   Thursday, 16 November 2017
Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!
Assignment - Reflective essay

Write a reflective essay (2–5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
  • Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Week 12

Course meetings
Monday, 20 November 2017
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.