Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Mega Man 8

Mega Man 8 edit

I've attempted to finally improve this article, something I've been meaning to do for what seems like years now. I'd like a better idea of what's expected from readers of better articles such as Mega Man 2, which was recently bumped to A-Class. Thank you. ~ Hibana (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From the Development section: "The team enlisted the help of the animation studio Xebec to create the animated cutscenes featured in the game, even though the studio itself was an hour-long trainride from the game developer." What does the distance between the studios have to do with anything? --Mika1h (talk) 19:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Article looks pretty good except for the following points.
- The intro should be reorganized based on the layout of the article. For example, it doesn't discuss Gameplay stuff until almost the end, even though that's the second section, and it doesn't mention Development at all.
- I don't know if the word "condemned" at the start of Reception is appropriate, since the game seems to have gotten fairly positive reviews except for Next Generation Magazine.
- The first sentence of Gameplay should have "that of" between "to" and "its".
- Gameplay needs a bit more sourcing. For example, the whole last paragraph is unsourced.
- The word "consumers" in Reception doesn't need to be linked. Tezero (talk) 23:12, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]