Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/Newsroom/Special

< Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads‎ | Newsletter‎ | Newsroom

Issue S1 (Special Issue) edit

Publication deadline: 12 PM Pacific-3 PM Eastern on September 27. Note: we will publish this issue on September 28, no matter what.

Please sign up for what you want to write. Have it done by the publication deadline.

Introduction edit

Contributor: Imzadi1979

Today is an auspicious day! Ten years ago, the U.S. Roads WikiProject was created. While there had been some state-level highway projects already, as well as WikiProject Highways, it was on September 28, 2005, that USRD was created. In celebration of our tin jubilee, we are publishing a special issue of The Centerline today to highlight the past decade of the project.

Like any endeavor involving multiple people, our project history has not been without growing pains over the years. Through various rocky periods over the last 10 years, USRD has emerged from those controversies to become the project that it is today. We have been recognized by others on Wikipedia over the years for our drive to create the best collection of articles that we can muster. In this issue, you'll find republished articles from past issues of the newsletter along with new content appearing for the first time. Regular features like the leaderboard, state updates and portal selected content will return for our next regular issue due out in November.

As the primary editor for The Centerline, I'd like to take a personal moment here to thank everyone in the project who has contributed content to the newsletter over the years. We are one of a small grouping of projects who actively produces a newsletter, and without your efforts, I could not assemble and distribute a quarterly publication like this. We always welcome new contributions at our newsroom.

A goal for success edit

Contributor: Dough4872

Over the years, the USRD project has come up with various yearly goals in order to help improve the articles. Sometimes these goals were met and sometimes they were not, depending on the difficulty of the goal and how active and motivated the project was to complete the goals. In addition to yearly goals, the project has also come up with long-term objectives which do not have a hard deadline.

One of the first goals the project came up with were stub drives, which occurred in 2010 and 2011. The project dropped 1,432 stubs in 2010 and 2,011 stubs in 2011. In 2012, the project did anti-stub vigilance, which kept the stub count from creeping back up and resulted in the loss of 100 stubs. Another goal set forth in 2012 called for the destubbing of Interstate and U.S. Route articles, which was achieved in 2013. The USRD project also got 25 states completely destubbed in 2013. The project has come up with other metrics to improve the quality of articles. A goal to get 250 articles to B-class in 2014 resulted in the upgrading of several articles despite falling short. The project also had goals to improve articles be lowering WikiWork. In 2013, the project was able to get its relative WikiWork below 4.4. For this year, USRD attempted to lower the cumulative WikiWork by 1010 classes in homage to the 10th anniversary of the project.

The project has also focused on improving our more important road articles. As mentioned above, we focused on destubbing and cleaning up the Interstate and U.S. Route articles. This year, the project focused on improving the national-level Interstate and U.S. Routes, which are often neglected by project editors. In 2014, the project attempted to get our most important article, U.S. Route 66, to GA; however, the goal was unsuccessful and it is hoped can be achieved in the future. USRD also undertook a drive in 2012 to convert the hardcoded RJLs in GA and better articles to use the {{jctint}} series of templates. In 2014, the project attempted to get 12 Featured Lists using the new Route list standards; however, only one FL was promoted that year.

USRD created the Planning Department in 2012 in order to facilitate the development of personal goals and featured content aspirations as well as to showcase what the official project goals for the year were. At the Planning Department, some of the unofficial goals that were developed included a pledge to get a GA every month of the year, Featured Content aspirations, a portal links drive, and an assessment audit. In 2014, the project came up with long-term objectives that would have no hard deadline. The objectives included rewriting templates to use Lua, converting the remaining hardcoded junction lists to use the jctint templates, adding maps to all GA and better articles, and adding KML files to all B-class and better articles.

@Dough4872: Maybe I'm being picky but perhaps we shouldn't be promoting a department (planning} that just got killed... --Rschen7754 04:55, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it still helps to discuss the goals we have achieved over the years. Dough4872 05:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From the first spinning cogs to controlling the power of the moon: the story of roads and our templates and modules edit

Contributor: Happy5214

Any successful WikiProject must project a consistent and standardized style on its articles. Usually, this goal is achieved through the use of templates. USRD has a long history of important templates, from {{infobox road}} and {{jct}} to the {{jctint}} series and {{routelist row}} and its siblings. The complicated code behind these templates has been written and rewritten over the years, taking advantage of recent technologies like Lua and Wikidata integration. There's still a lot to accomplish with these rewrites, but significant speed improvements can already be seen across our articles. These templates are as old as the project itself, and so it's only fitting that on this anniversary occasion, we take a look back on our backend code.

It started way back when. How far back exactly is likely lost to deletion, but we know that the early years of USRD were defined by a plethora of infoboxes. Reflecting the project's origins as a federation of individual state projects, infoboxes were unique to each state and highway system. However, as USRD began to enforce national content standards, these numerous state-specific templates were gradually merged into what became {{infobox road}}, or IBR for short. I've been on Wikipedia for about eight-and-a-half years, and I can vaguely remember the old templates. One of my first tasks for USRD was helping to convert infoboxes to IBR. Our infobox eventually went global, truly earning its generic name. In my mind, this is our most defining template.

Of course, we've produced other templates. Our most complicated template was the behemoth that was {{jct}}. Jct is the most used of our many article templates, often being transcluded hundreds of times on our longest articles. It was a hackish monster, filled with messy code and hardcoded, inflexible functionality. Combined with its repeated usage on articles, {{jct}} was responsible for most of our page-load performance issues. {{Jct}}, as our highway link template, is usually found in our junction lists. Originally written using plain table syntax, efforts continue to convert our remaining hardcoded RJLs to a series of templates, most notably {{jctint}} and its wrappers. These templates also had flexibility issues, a result of the parser functions used to write them. Parser functions are basically hacks of the MediaWiki code, riddled with inefficiencies and ill-suited for complex scripts.

Enter Lua, my ticket back into the project. Lua is a full-fledged and simple programming language, deployed with the express goal of cleaning up complicated template code. The lunar era, as I call it, began with {{routelist row}}, our first major template to be written in Lua. These early successes were followed by rewrites of the RJL templates. Finally, I undertook a complete rewrite of {{jct}}, using a centralized module database of shield, link, and abbreviation data written for a powerful parser that could completely replace the old parser functions. Upon deployment, our page-loading bottlenecks were gone. The Lua version also included unlimited numbers of highways and locations per call, all while preserving the existing functionality. This same centralized database was included in {{routelist row}} and a rewrite of the browse boxes found in page and infobox footers.

We still have work to do. {{Infobox road}} needs to be fully converted to Lua, among other things. We are also in the early stages of including data from Wikidata items in our templates. Maps from Wikidata are already available through IBR, and more data should be coming soon. These templates and modules form an integral part of our project's continued success, and ensuring that they keep up with the latest advances in template coding is imperative. Templates are the gears of our articles, and I hope that last night's lunar eclipse reminds you of the power of the Moon. Or, in this case, a programming language named after it. Feliĉan dekan datrevenon!


@Happy5214: If you can, please have this written by Sept 27, as I will go to press on the 28th no matter what. Imzadi 1979 → 12:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Imzadi1979: Worst case, we can probably recycle some of the old posts too. --Rschen7754 04:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Past stories that could probably be reused with minimal editing edit

Contributor:

Also, another way to get story ideas might be to go through old stories and find themes: roadgeek meets/Wikimeets seem to come up quite a lot in the older issues, for one; April Fool's, milestones (2M, 4M), failed projects that died (like Article Improvement Drive, Adopt a Road, SH WPs, etc.) --Rschen7754 22:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Scott5114 and Fredddie: could either of you help me to either excerpt Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-02-25/WikiProject report (which would also credit Mabeenot as the contributor), or write up something new along those lines for the issue? I could rerun the interview as it originally appeared in The Signpost, but for once I'm trying to keep the size of the issue down instead of trying to bulk it up. Imzadi 1979 → 12:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One of my goals with this issue was to present the full history of USRD, warts and all. However, with the one ArbCom article, and a pending summary of SRNC to be added, I'm afraid we've got too many of the warts showing. That's why I'm hoping we can run something related to WikiWork making The Signpost and hit on some of the other positives to balance the issue. I know our history as a project has not always been the greatest, but we have so many good things that we've accomplished. I'd write a piece on our legacy with FAs/FLs/GAs and TFAs/TFLs, but given that I've been such a major contributor there, I feel out of place and tooting my own horn, so to speak. I can always do a quick "USRD by the numbers" sidebar to compare the growth of our Featured and Good content and the steady drop in WW on the leaderboard. Any thoughts? Imzadi 1979 → 14:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration edit

Contributor: Rschen7754
Note: this should probably be towards the end of the newsletter. --Rschen7754 04:30, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been an administrator on the English Wikipedia since December 16, 2005. However, I only remained semi-active as an administrator for many years, instead focusing on the development of this WikiProject.

In 2012, I felt a desire to get involved in other areas of Wikimedia. I started by getting more active in administrative work on the English Wikipedia. Pretty soon, by the end of 2013, I had become a Wikidata administrator and oversighter, an English Wikivoyage administrator, a sockpuppet investigations clerk, arbitration clerk, and a global sysop.

By early 2014, I had gained enough experience and motivation to become a Wikimedia steward, the highest user right a volunteer can have, with complete access to the interface on all public Wikimedia sites, including handling CheckUser and oversight matters. I planned to remain a steward for at least a few years, seeing that I knew how to use the tools effectively and felt like I was truly making a difference.

Stewards are considered to be the "most trusted" members of the Wikimedia community; the elections are announced on every Wikimedia site for three weeks, and over two hundred people vote in them. Most of them have served for years in this role and in other highly trusted roles across Wikimedia. And yet, I soon found myself disappointed when working with some of my colleagues, finding that while they were technically competent, they were difficult to work with. By the end of my first term, even though I would likely have been reappointed, I realized that the additional stress was unhealthy for me, and I decided not to continue, even resigning a few days earlier than planned due to yet another fight on the steward mailing list that had turned into bickering.

So why do I mention all of this on our tenth anniversary?

Because over the course of that experience, I grew to appreciate working with my fellow road editors. It is true that in the past, we were known for causing drama that had to be resolved by outside parties. But over the years, we have learned how to work as a team despite our differences. We disagree quite often, but we respect each other’s opinion, and work towards a solution that is agreeable to everyone. And when hard work needs to be done, there are always those willing to step up and do want is necessary, since back in 2007 when we first assessed the few thousand articles in our scope. As a team, we turned these articles from the ruins that they were post-SRNC into what they are today with our standards and framework, which outsiders have criticized, but which have proven to be successful. Thus, I think the overarching success story of the U.S. Roads WikiProject is not the number of GAs or FAs that we have created. Instead, it is that we have been able to create a team that serves as a model of the collaborative experience that Wikimedia should truly be like, in a greater environment of increasing polarization and a declining editorship.

Admittedly, my activity is decreasing due to increasing outside commitments, and I don't know how much longer I will be able to remain a regular editor. But my time at USRD is something that I will always remember. I am grateful to have had this experience, and it will be something that I am proud to have been a part of. --Rschen7754 21:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


@Rschen7754: any developments here? I'll be at work on Monday, so I'd like to get the content submitted tomorrow and build the issue so that I can send things out right after work to get a timestamp of the 28th. Also, if any thing we're going to republish that you wrote before needs any further editing to prep it, go ahead and edit as necessary. I was thinking that the editorial excerpt could use an update for the 2012-present section, using the 2013 YiR and other similar stuff to just pad it out a few lines. Imzadi 1979 → 13:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case closes edit

Contributor: Imzadi1979 (originally published April 30, 2008)

ArbCom is over!

That's the biggest news affecting USRD over the last several months. The case was closed April 7, 2008, with no formal enforcement measures enacted. The Arbitration Committee's decision was enacted, "in light of the hope that editors will act of their own volition and take with them a more in-depth understanding of the issues, principles, and the disputes themselves, for future benefit and to avoid the need for more formal responses."[1]

The case was requested by several parties after three Requests for Comment about user NE2 and at least one rejected attempt at mediation through the Mediation Cabal. The unresolved issues from these RFCs centered around consensus debates concerning the issues discussed at WP:USRD. The largest issue cited was the debate over the usage of words for former highways and highway designations. Issues from the ArbCom also impacted WP:Good Articles. A temporary injunction was put in place to bar editing of the USRD project page beyond normal usage. Until the resolution of the case, USRD project scope was to remain fixed and project tags were not to be removed from disputed articles. Evidence was provided and debated throughout the course of the case, even during the voting phase.

A motion was offered at one point to dismiss the case during voting, however the Arbitration Committee did reach a number of findings concerning the usage of consensus and the nature of wikiprojects. The proposed remedies passed by the Committee were limited to counseling editors over editorial conflicts and establishing previous consensus. The closing of the case removed the restrictions on the project page and project tags.

USRD through the years edit

Contributor: Rschen7754 (large portions taken from an editorial originally published Winter 2012)

On September 18, 2005, I founded the U.S. Roads WikiProject as a simple project designed to "adopt" the states without a state highway WikiProject and allow for new WP:WSS stubs to be created with a lower minimum number of articles.

I'd like to briefly recap the history of USRD. We currently have 26 archive pages of WT:USRD, and I neither have the time nor space to mention everything. But I'm going to give a very brief summary. I've organized it into four "eras" of USRD:

  • Before 2006: the "unorganized" era. Before 2006, the road articles were highly unorganized, as was much of Wikipedia during this time. A lot of the articles were created between 2004 and 2006. Highway articles would quite frequently get sent to AFD, with mixed results. There were only state WikiProjects, and very few; the USRD project was created towards the end of this era, as a "shell project" to theoretically serve as the next higher level above the state projects, although almost all of the editing activity took place at the state level. There were very few FAs, and GA didn't exist in its present form for most of this time. This era began to draw to a close with the events that led up to the first Highways arbitration case and WP:SRNC, when the project divided over how to name articles.
  • 2006–2008—the beginnings of USRD—After SRNC, we spent the next few months repairing relationships and catching up with the mess that our articles had become in the meantime. However, towards 2007, many of the USRD facilities that we take for granted today developed, such as assessment, IRC, IH, USH, most of the state highway WikiProjects, ELG (which would become RJL), the shields task force, MTF, and ACR. We formed this project newsletter in January 2007 to respond to issues that were taking place and to unify the project. We began to get our first GAs as a project. The development of {{U.S. Roads WikiProject}} took place; while most collaboration took place at the state level, the USRD project was beginning to form. This era ended in early 2008 with the second Highways arbitration case, when internal disagreements led to an arbitration case, which had very few remedies and did little to resolve the internal problems.
  • 2008–2012—the transition period—After the second arbitration case we entered a transition period, where we slowly went from over 30 state highway WikiProjects to one national WikiProject. A race began to get FAs and GAs, and to reduce WikiWork and the number of stubs through two stub drives. The county challenges and USRDCups played a major role in this as well. The newsletter was eventually decommissioned in 2008, but resurfaced in 2010, after attempts at a project blog failed. The switch to {{Infobox road}} took place, and our notability guidelines developed. The focus of USRD switched from quantity to quality, as we worked on making higher-quality articles. Many events transpired that drew us together, such as the Racepacket arbitration case, the geocoordinates debates, and the revisions to RJL and {{Infobox road}} to make it international. This era recently ended with the consolidation of nearly all the state highway WikiProjects into task forces of USRD. While this happened officially in 2012, this had unofficially been taking place for years as standards merged and editors networked. As our editing base has declined, it is easier to maintain one national project. In addition to this, there are few state-specific variations of standards, and the projects were eventually seen as redundant. New York initially remained its own state highway WikiProject after the transition.
  • 2012–2014–rebirth—Now that our project has been unified, we are moving forward as one unit. A few of our primary editors from earlier eras returned, and the project underwent a renaissance. We expanded across Wikimedia to other projects, including Wikidata, Meta, Commons, and Wikisource. We gained several featured articles, many of which went on the main page. In addition to this, we developed standards for lists, and overhauled many of our templates to use Lua, improving page rendering times. The New York state highway project was merged back into USRD.
  • 2014–– While some of our primary editors have become less active due to real-life commitments, there have been a few who have kept the project running while creating quality content.

But this leaves a great opportunity for you, the reader of this newsletter. There are several opportunities to get more involved in the project. Thus, I encourage you: Be part of the turnaround... now become part of the solution! To learn how, feel free to ask questions at our main page, WT:USRD, or in the IRC channel.

Thank you edit

Contributor: Everyone

We should compile an alphabetized list of editors who were "regular" USRD editors over the years as a way to say thanks. This may take some trawling of page histories, but I think we can make a fairly substantial list. –Fredddie™ 20:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a start, I went through the participants pages (new and old) and added people I recognized. Feel free to add anyone I missed. –Fredddie™ 21:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. 25or6to4
  2. A Texas Historian
  3. ACase000
  4. Admrboltz
  5. AHeneen
  6. Alansohn
  7. Algorerythyms
  8. Atanamir
  9. Arkoutdoors
  10. Awtribute
  11. Bennyp81
  12. Bigpoliticsfan
  13. Bitmapped
  14. Bloonstdfan360
  15. Blue1424
  16. Brandonrush
  17. Britinvasion64
  18. Brmedia
  19. BryanWeather
  20. C.Fred
  21. C16ish
  22. Carpetmaster101
  23. CC21560
  24. Cg2916
  25. CL
  26. CycloneIsaac
  27. Damon207
  28. DandyDan2007
  29. Daniel Case
  30. DanTD
  31. DanTheMan474
  32. DeFaultRyan
  33. Detcin
  34. DJ Cane
  35. Dough4872
  36. DudeWithAFeud
  37. DyluckTRocket
  38. EaglesFaninTampa
  39. Edit Centric
  40. Fortguy
  41. Fredddie
  42. Fwgoebel
  43. Gamweb
  44. Gateman1997
  45. Geopgeop
  46. Gfoley4
  47. GTSinc
  48. Happy5214
  49. Hmich176
  50. Holderca1
  51. Howcheng
  52. Hurricanehink
  53. Imzadi1979
  54. Intelati
  55. InTheAM
  56. Jay8g
  57. Jayron32
  58. Jeff02
  59. Joe3090
  60. JohnnyAlbert10
  61. JohnnyBGood
  62. Juliancolton
  63. Jwhouk
  64. Kacie Jane
  65. Kinu
  66. Ks0stm
  67. Kumba42
  68. Kurykh
  69. Ljthefro
  70. Lpangelrob
  71. Mapsax
  72. Master son
  73. Mcdonaat
  74. Mes tex
  75. MichaelR.
  76. Michael J
  77. Mitchazenia
  78. Moabdave
  79. MPD01605
  80. Mr. Matté
  81. Morriswa
  82. Ncchild
  83. NE2
  84. Ngs61
  85. O
  86. Onore Baka Sama
  87. Otr500
  88. Parsa
  89. Pedriana
  90. Pepper
  91. Pepper6181
  92. PhATxPnOY916
  93. Philroc
  94. PointsofNoReturn
  95. Polaron
  96. Presidentman
  97. Pzoxicuvybtnrm
  98. Raime
  99. Rcsprinter
  100. Realkyhick
  101. RoyalBroil
  102. Rschen7754
  103. Sable232
  104. Scott5114
  105. Sehome Bay
  106. Seicer
  107. SounderBruce
  108. Station Attendant
  109. Stratosphere
  110. Tckma
  111. TCN7JM
  112. TheCatalyst31
  113. The Bushranger
  114. Tim Sabin
  115. Triadian
  116. Triskele Jim
  117. TwinsMetsFan
  118. Vaoverland
  119. Viridiscalculus
  120. WashuOtaku
  121. West Virginian
  122. WikiLeon
  123. Xenon54
  124. Youngamerican
Are we including editors from before USRD started? i.e. the 3-5 SH WPs around beforehand (CA, WA, and a few others?) --Rschen7754 23:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From the Editor edit

  1. ^ Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways 2
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S._Roads/Newsletter/Newsroom/Special&oldid=1087815618"