Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2013/February

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting‎ | Proposals‎ | Archive‎ | 2013
< January March >

Proposals, February 2013

South American politics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose new templates and categories for South American politics and elections. Would ensure that all of the major countries have an 'election' template and an overarching 'Politics' category, with a 'poli' template:

Dawynn (talk) 14:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Support speedy. --Fadesga (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New South American political party stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
speedy categories to be split from Category:South American political party stubs:

Dawynn (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{tunicata-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Request exploratory template to pick up some neglected animals. See Tunicate. Dawynn (talk) 19:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Coimbra geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy request for category for {{Coimbra-geo-stub}}. 61 articles. Dawynn (talk) 13:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Aveiro geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy proposal to pick up {{Aveiro-geo-stub}}. 60 articles. Dawynn (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Canid stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose Category:Canid stubs/{{canid-stub}} - this should catch 81 stubs, in addition to the already extant Category:Dog stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Support speedy. Category:Dog stubs includes some articles that actually deserve being categorized under Category:Canid stubs. --Fadesga (talk) 17:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Eastern Catholicism stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hi fellows. I have been going through the Category:Roman Catholic Church stubs, and it is enormous, over 700 stubs. There is one group of Catholic churches that fall under the common denomination Eastern Catholicism (all of them have a rite that differs from the Roman Catholic, as it resembles that of Orthodox churches). I upmerged a template within the Category:Roman Catholic Church stubs, named {{EasternCatholic-stub}}, and it already has 70 stubs. Maybe it is time to think about a specific Category:Eastern Catholicism stubs. What do you say? Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Support speedy. Dawynn (talk) 00:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Category created. --Fadesga (talk) 01:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2013/February&oldid=1138356720"