Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/United States v. The Progressive

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history‎ | Assessment
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted. Anotherclown (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United States v. The Progressive edit

Nominator(s): Hawkeye7 (talk)


Don't mean to flood A class with articles, but this one had been listed for GA review back in October, and only just got through. At some point I'd like to send it to Featured, but who knows how long that will take. However, although it is a legal article, it is still within the scope of WP:MILHIST, so eligible for a review here. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. I reviewed this article at GAN a couple of days ago here Talk:United States v. The Progressive/GA1 and it not only met all the GA criteria, but in my view it surpassed many of them significantly. I consider it is A class material. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:08, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Extremely high quality article. Excellent quality improvement efforts by Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs). Quite commendable. — Cirt (talk) 02:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Without question, this meets the criteria for A-Class, and it should be considered for FA. GregJackP Boomer! 03:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Comments: I made a few minor tweaks, but to be honest I'm out of my depth with this article. I only have a couple of minor nitpicks:
    • inconsistent "hydrogen bomb" v "Hydrogen Bomb" (the section header should probably be "Hydrogen bomb");
    • Note 74 probably needs a retrieved date;
    • there are a few examples of potential overlink: in the References both Hewlett and Morland are linked three times in a row, which is probably excessive;
    • other examples of overlink in the text are: Robert Oppenheimer; Hans Bethe; Howard Morland; United States House of Representatives;
    • could ISSNs be added for the journal articles in the References?
    • alt text for the magazine cover and Federal building images? [1] AustralianRupert (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So far so good on prose per standard disclaimer, down to where I stopped, about two-thirds of the way, at United_States_v._The_Progressive#Legal arguments. These are my edits. - Dank (push to talk) 23:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment/United_States_v._The_Progressive&oldid=533806213"