Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (Bn–Bz)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:46, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (Bn–Bz) edit

Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk)


I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it complements the list of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (Ba–Bm), which is also currently under review, for all the recipients starting with the letter "B". It follows the proven layout of all the previous lists of this topic. I believe to have included all the recent feedback on this topic. Cheers and thanks for the review. MisterBee1966 (talk) 06:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CommentsSupport by Peacemaker67 (send... over) 05:56, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • To your usual high standard, MB. A couple of things.
  • You might like to link Oberwachtmeister to Wachtmeister, given there is no page for the former.
  • Per my comment on (Ba-Bm), I note you are using "troop" in the notes etc, I suggest "unit" is sufficiently generic and a far better translation into English, or you could say "XYZ was nominated for the Knight's Cross" and thereby avoid using troop or unit.
  • Listings where there is no citation for the rank or date of award, Bork, Botsch, Bremermann, Bretz, Bröckerhoff, Bühler, Büttner, Burchard, Burgemeister. Most would be Fellgiebel I imagine.

That's all I have. Well done. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 05:56, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support: G'day, I believe that this meets the A-class criteria. I made a minor adjustment and have a couple of minor comments:

  • I wasn't sure about the meaning of this: "The existing file card is not contemporary!" (Note 51)
  • which English language variation are you using? I saw "Labour" (British) and "favor" (US). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Comments

  • The only thing that I caught was re-dated the award on the 6 May 1945 Delete the second "the"--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.