Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 October 10

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< October 9 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 10

edit

01:37, 10 October 2023 review of submission by KingTheD

edit

How can I improve this draft? Any feedback is appreciated. KingTheD (talk) 01:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KingTheD: you need to show that this person is notable according to at least one of the guidelines. Not only that, you also must show that he is noteworthy; show us some reason why he should be included in a global encyclopaedia, because at the moment the draft describes a Mr Everyman, IMO. Wikipedia is not a biographical database where the mere existence is enough to warrant inclusion. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you KingTheD (talk) 05:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

01:53, 10 October 2023 review of submission by HollyNaylor

edit

Please could anyone help me with this? I received the feedback: "Please remove the external links from the body" and the submission was declined because of this. Which part of the body section should I remove the links from? Is it the very first section at the top of the page? Thank you HollyNaylor (talk) 01:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HollyNaylor the reviewer happens to be talking about any link in the article that redirects to a different site other than Wikipedia. Kline • talk to me! • contribs 03:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

06:32, 10 October 2023 review of submission by TheTinySpeck

edit

Hiii! I am in the process of creating a Wikipedia page for a friend who is a film director, and there's an upcoming project in the works. I've included all the essential links to establish his notability, including his IMDb page for one of his films. Your assistance in publishing the page would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much for your help! TheTinySpeck (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTinySpeck: the first thing you need to do is declare your conflict of interest (COI), given that you're writing about an acquaintance of yours.
After that, please review relevant notability guidelines, at least WP:GNG and WP:NDIRECTOR. You need to show that the subject meets one or both of these. Notability is established by sources, and you currently only cite one source, IMDb, which is not considered reliable, and therefore adds nothing to either notability or even basic verifiability.
You also need to remove all the inline external links from the draft, as these are not allowed. You can convert them to citations where relevant.
After all that, you're welcome to resubmit the draft, and it will be reviewed again in due course. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09:08, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Aman2936

edit

The reason behind why a page is declined? Aman Prabhakar (talk) 09:08, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aman2936 I fixed your link(it was missing the "Draft:") The reason for the decline was left by the reviewer. Do you have a question about it specifically?
If you are associated with this company, you must read conflict of interest. If you are compensated by this company for any purpose, the Terms of Use require you to make a paid edtiing disclosure. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

12:59, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Pakistan7246

edit

I Need help to add References Pakistan7246 (talk) 12:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pakistan7246: I'd say you rather need help with adding the appropriate number of useful references – please see WP:REFBOMB. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes You Are Absolutley right I need help with adding the appropriate number of useful references but can u help me Pakistan7246 (talk) 13:13, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pakistan7246: find 3-5 sources that meet the WP:GNG standard (= reliable and independent secondary sources with significant coverage of the subject), and summarise what they have said; then cite each source against the information it has provided. This way you should end up with no more than a couple of citations against any one statement, while ensuring that every material statement is cited. There really is no reason why a statement like "Its first kalam featured Faysal Qureshi along with Waseem Badami & Farhan Ali Waris in a special appearance" would need 17 citations against it. Take out all the flaky sources, leave only the strongest ones that are also solid enough to establish notability. Job's a good 'un. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
alright thank you @DoubleGrazing for your tips i will do what you said but like how much refernences do i need Pakistan7246 (talk) 13:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pakistan7246: I don't know how many you need, depends on the content. You need 3+ sources to establish notability per WP:GNG. You need a citation or at most two to support each material statement and anything potentially contentious. Beyond that, it's one of those 'how long is a piece of string' questions. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @DoubleGrazing I Delted all the references on The Draft Draft:Farhan Ali Waris and added New True references can u please check it and see if u can publish it to the article mainspace? Pakistan7246 (talk) 16:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:05, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Vsharmavs

edit

Can you guide me what did I do mistake on my page ? Vsharmavs (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vsharmavs: Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a social media platform; if you wish to tell the world about yourself, try the likes of LinkedIn or Facebook. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Vsharmavs You need to add more references so it can be a good draft Pakistan7246 (talk) 13:29, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, @Pakistan7246, don't give poor advice. You don't need more references you need quality references. A few reliable, independent, secondary references are far better than 20 poor quality ones. Qcne (talk) 13:56, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:28, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Mragoplay123

edit

Hey, could I get more feedback about what specifically needs to be improved in this Monro article?

Thanks Mragoplay123 (talk) 13:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On thing is that the last few references are just URLs. You should add a title, the date, the publisher, and the author of the article if you can find it. KingTheD (talk) 23:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14:43, 10 October 2023 review of submission by 5txzk

edit

I don't understand the reason given for rejection. "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified." Please look at the submitted draft for Charles Robert O'Dell and advise me how to correct the draft. 5txzk (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@5txzk It's fine. The issues are minor and can be fixed in normal editing. Please resubmit and I'll accept it. Sorry about this. -- asilvering (talk) 20:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14:52, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Siddsantham

edit

Hi, please help me understand why my article submission has been declined. Sermon is a critically acclaimed new band which tours across Europe and North America, and they have released two albums already, both of which have received press coverage (and rave reviews) from music review outlets. I believe they do deserve a page of their own due to their contributions to heavy music. (I do apologize if I have broken Wikipedia rules with my submission, I am truly new to this process.) Siddsantham (talk) 14:52, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Siddsantham: this draft was declined (and BTW, I've restored the earlier decline template, as this must stay with the draft until it is accepted) for failing to show notability: the sources are insufficient to meet the WP:GNG standard, and there is no evidence that the band is notable per WP:BAND, either. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:46, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14:55, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Cinefilm

edit

Can someone help me? I've been working on this page for months, but I always get rejected. It's not right! I love wikipedia, and I trust that I support it very much, quietly, but I support it. I would like to create other pages, but if they don't accept me on this one, I think I'll throw in the towel. It's not fair because there are pages accepted without funds, why? Cinefilm (talk) 14:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cinefilm: what does "there are pages accepted without funds" mean? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cinefilm: this draft has been declined five times for lack of evidence for notability; that probably tells us that the subject simply is not notable enough to warrant inclusion. In addition, the referencing is inadquate, as it lacks inline citations.
Other than that, I'm not sure what more I can tell you, or quite what your question is? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15:24, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Stuoop1dstoodant124342

edit

I don't know how to make an article. I went here for my middle school years and feel as if there should be an article about it Stuoop1dstoodant124342 (talk) 15:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Stuoop1dstoodant124342: schools need to demonstrate notability, which means citing multiple independent and reliable secondary sources that have covered them in significant extent. In practice, most schools would fail this test. (Note that many school articles do exist, but they mostly predate this notability requirement.) If the school isn't independently notable, then usually the title would be redirected to an article on the school district or similar higher-level unit. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16:40, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Tosonotti

edit

Hi. How can I modify this article in order to get it approved?

WellTax is a leading international accountancy firm with offices in London, United Kingdom, and Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The company specializes in providing a wide range of accounting, advisory and tax services to clients across various industries.

Established in 2015, the company specializes in providing a wide range of tax-related services to individuals and businesses worldwide. Nowadays, the company has a capillary network of customers, suppliers and partners and counts more than 10 employees spread between the two offices of London a Dubai.

History

WellTax was founded in London in 2015. The firm initially started as a local accounting practice in the United Kingdom and in 2023 expanded its operations to the United Arab Emirates.

For the first three years of its existence, the company was called Wallace & Partners and only in 2018 the name was changed to the current one of WellTax.

In October 2023, WellTax revealed a new logo, which represents an evolution towards a more modern and dynamic approach to tax advice. The new logo embodies the company’s dedication to agile tax advice and listening to clients' needs.

Services and Industries

WellTax offers a comprehensive suite of financial and accounting services, including:

- Accountancy: WellTax provides comprehensive financial management, bookkeeping, and reporting services.

- Business & Corporate Tax: The company offers strategic tax planning and compliance services to optimise its clients’ tax position and unlock valuable opportunities.

- Governance: From legal entity formation to company secretarial duties, WellTax works to ensure that every organisation is compliant and well-managed.

- International: Cross-border business solutions and strategic guidance in multiple jurisdictions.

- Payments & Payroll: Simplify payroll processing and streamline payment systems with efficient solutions tailored to its clients’ needs.

- Private clients: WellTax’s personalised services cater to the unique financial needs of individuals, helping them to achieve their personal goals.

The industries in which the company specialises are: Arts & Media; Charities & Not for Profit; Education; Energy & Resources; Engineering & Manufacturing; Financial Services; Hospitality & Leisure; Property & Construction; Retail & Wholesale; Technology.

Clients

WellTax serves a diverse clientele that includes multinational corporations, SMEs, non-profit organizations, and individuals.

Partnerships

WellTax can count on numerous partnerships around the world, including but not limited to The Italian Chamber of Commerce and Industry for the UK, Spanish Chamber of Commerce in the United Kingdom, Italian Industry & Commerce Office in the UAE, UK Confederation by Confassociazioni and Spectrum Accounting. Tosonotti (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that you can, it is just blatant advertising totally unsuitable for an encyclopaedia and has been tagged for speedy deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

19:38, 10 October 2023 review of submission by RaghThink02

edit

I have used all the references that I had but i do not know why it is still not getting approved. RaghThink02 (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If that is all the references that you have, this company does not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. Two of your references are to the company website, and the other is an annoucement of a location opening. You must instead summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose on their own to say about this company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. 331dot (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20:11, 10 October 2023 review of submission by KMRN55

edit

Could you please help me with this page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Simply_Fixable. Can you explain what is missing in the article for confirmation KMRN55 (talk) 20:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the comments left by reviewers, as well as the content at the links they left. 331dot (talk) 08:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20:14, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Rusty5231B

edit

Followed link to non-existent article from indirect procurement was prompted to create article. Created basic article. Was reverted to draft for not having the right citations. Added citations and was quickly rejected again. Now, asking for help with this article or to have link removed. Rusty5231B (talk) 20:14, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rusty5231B. I think the topic might work as an article, but you've gone about it the wrong way. You've created an overview of this topic and then provided loads of sources and examples that seem fairly irrelevant to the actual topic. Instead, find a few sources that define, discuss, and analyse the topic and then paraphrase them in your own words. That should make up the content of your draft. I imagine it'll only need to be a few paragraphs long. Hope that helps. Qcne (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The recommended changes have been made. How can I get this draft considered for an article again? Rusty5231B (talk) 01:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Rusty5231B, that's certainly better. However still not quite there. We don't have Conclusion sections on Wikipedia articles like this- just merge the text into the main body. You're also missing a References heading. Remove all the bolding in the body of the text too.
My biggest issue is that the two sources you provide define tertiary sectors, not "Goods and services not related to manufacturing" - the two sources don't even seem to mention it. You need a source that actually defines what its meant by "Goods and services not related to manufacturing" and provides a bit of discussion. Qcne (talk) 13:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20:23, 10 October 2023 review of submission by Syed7246

edit

should I add more references to this article Syed7246 (talk) 20:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All of your sources are associated with this show. This article must summarize what independent reliable sources choose on their own to say about it. For shows, that usually means reviews by professional reviewers. 331dot (talk) 20:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh Alright Thanks for your tips i will so should I go to the websites that reviewed this show basically? Syed7246 (talk) 20:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If they are reputable, professional reviewers, that may work. 331dot (talk) 21:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_October_10&oldid=1180334045"