Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 October 14
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < October 13 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | October 15 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
October 14
edit04:26:40, 14 October 2022 review of submission by Sush150
edit
Next month film will releasing. Please activate this article now.
Sush150 (talk) 04:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- No. We are not your billboard. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 22:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
05:26:20, 14 October 2022 review of submission by RahulKDRK
editI really want to get this article approved because I did my better research on Indian co-producer Mr. Rajiv John Sauson as I feel he is an Inspiration to youth I believe this article will help. Please do let me know if any changes are required.
RahulKDRK (talk) 05:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- @RahulKDRK: laudable as your aim of inspiring the youth may be, that isn't the basis on which articles are published. We need to see notability, in this case either by WP:GNG or WP:FILMMAKER, and this draft clearly fails on both counts. Also, the vast majority of the content is unreferenced, which is wholly unacceptable in an article on a living person. In conclusion, you may yet get this draft accepted, but as it stands it is still very far from it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
07:25:27, 14 October 2022 review of draft by DavidMolla
edit- DavidMolla (talk · contribs)
To whom it may concern,
I write you regarding a draft that I'm writing about prof. Dario DiFrancesco (draft link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dario_DiFrancesco).
I've submitted it a few times already but it keeps being rejected because "the submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. [...] Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject."
In order to ease the publication, could someone please point me out which passages need to be modified?
Thanks kindly, waiting for your feedback,
David
DavidMolla (talk) 07:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @DavidMolla: to be honest, I can't find much wrong with the tone. It's also clear that this person meets our notability criteria on several fronts. I'm therefore going to accept this article. (Yes, there are some issues with it, and I will tag it accordingly, but those are fairly minor and can be sorted out after publication.) Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:47, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your fast response DavidMolla (talk) 08:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
12:28:42, 14 October 2022 review of draft by VarunA11
edit
Why my document submission was declined. Please
VarunA11 (talk) 12:28, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- @VarunA11: did you read the decline notice, in the grey box inside the large pink box? It explains why. It's not the only reason why this could be declined, but let's start with that.
- While you're at it, please read also the autobio message I posted on your talk page. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- VarunA11 The reason is given at the top of your draft. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves, or post their resume or accomplishments. A Wikipedia article about a person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. It is highly advised that you not attempt to write about yourself, see the autobiography policy, but if you insist on doing so, you must set aside everything you know about yourself and all materials you put out, and only write based on what others have chosen on their own to say about you. Most people cannot do that about themselves. If you just want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media. 331dot (talk) 12:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Please point out which sources are not reliable and explain why.
Please point out which sections are unsourced.
Ciao bill (talk) 15:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Ciao bill: The Honors and Publications sections are completely unsourced. Also, many of the sources appear to be routine announcements of the subject being appointed to a position, but not much about why that's significant. Just being a head of a museum isn't in itself grounds for notability, as Wikipedia defines it. Can you post the three best profiles of the subject? TechnoTalk (talk) 03:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the prompt response. Wikipedia includes entries on directors of museums that appear to lack notability, however being the founding director of a museum, especially the founding director of three museums with extraordinary missions—The Taylor Museum of the Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center, the Abby Aldrich Rockefeller American Folk Art Collection Museum, and the Amon Carter Museum of American Art should be notable.
- Please see my edit to the Honors Section and let me know if there's a way to cite Mitch's acceptance into the Cosmos club as a reliable validation of his honors.
- For the publications, will links to library catalog entries be adequate? Ciao bill (talk) 21:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)