Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 February 28

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< February 27 << Jan | February | Mar >> March 1 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 28

edit

05:14:54, 28 February 2022 review of draft by 122.160.153.168

edit


122.160.153.168 (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I have added secondary reference to the draft page PERICENT, still it is rejected. I want to know the valid reason behind this.

I just declined the draft as blatant advertising! "to rapidly deliver powerful business process applications." " stands tall with a decade of experience in delivering workflow" "with that deep passion for technology" Theroadislong (talk) 09:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir

Can you please explain the reason behind not publishing my draft in detail

so that I can change them accordingly.122.160.153.168 (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, and no amount of editing can change that. The reasons have been given on the draft. 331dot (talk) 10:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For further comment, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As my submission is rejected , I have to create new page or do changes on previous page— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.160.153.168 (talk • contribs)
Rejection means that it cannot be resubmitted in any form. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:42:24, 28 February 2022 review of draft by Jackjohn15

edit


Jackjohn15 (talk) 12:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:18:39, 28 February 2022 review of submission by Slmer

edit

Hello, Service Lifecycle Management(SLM) is the subset of Product Lifecycle Management that deals with after sales stage of a product. I think it should be part of Wikipedia for the following reasons: 1) Leading commercial Product Lifecycle Management(PLM) software vendors like Siemens Digital Industries Software, PTC and others refer to SLM as a domain within their PLM offering 2) There is already an SLM article in Wikipedia in German language and it makes sense to have one in English as well(https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service-Lifecycle-Management). 3) SLM is being referred to as a phase of PLM in the PLM article of Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_lifecycle#Phase_4:_Service) 4) It represents a real approach of handling service data as part of the complete product lifecycle management

The current article is basic, but for the reasons above I think it represents a real topic, not a marketing trend, with actual need and a set of commercial vendors investing in solutions of that need. Hence I am kindly asking re-review of the article.

Many thanks

Slmer (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slmer The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. That other language Wikipedias have a particular article does not necessarily mean this one should. Each langauge version of Wikipedia is its own project, with their own editors and policies. What is acceptable on one version is not necessarily acceptable on another. Regarding the draft itself, the sources do little more than define the term. They are not significant coverage of discussion of this terminology. 331dot (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:22:39, 28 February 2022 review of submission by Antikcha Moran

edit


Antikcha Moran (talk) 13:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link Draft:Dr. Bidyananda Borkakoti --Orange Mike | Talk 01:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:46:59, 28 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Simona.lamba

edit


Hi, my first article has been rejected...I´m working on it again and would like to know: • What is the specific criteria for when a sentence or piece of information requires a citation? • Are internal citations (i.e. links back to your own website) acceptable, or should they be avoided.

Thanks a lot!

Simona.lamba (talk) 15:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simona.lamba Just noting that it was only declined, not rejected. Rejected would mean it could not be reconsidered. 331dot (talk) 15:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To answer your question, a Wikipedia article must primarily summarize what independent reliable sources say about the topic. Every substantive claim should have a citation(i.e not something like the sky being blue). 331dot (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:38:43, 28 February 2022 review of draft by Elonadam

edit


Hello, Elmedin mot left Screen Media to join Eurovia! (As you can see at official web site http://screenmedia.mk/new/?p=4501 )

Elonadam (talk) 18:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:11:46, 28 February 2022 review of draft by Tobyhoward

edit


Hi, I am a long-time WikiGnome and have now written my first article (about the 1980 TV movie "The Hard Way"). The reviewer has declined the draft article with the comment "This draft lacks Reception information, such as reviews. Please expand with Reception information." This is perfectly fair, and I would like to fix this. My question is: what reviews would be considered acceptable? I cannot find any 1980 reviews from the likes of Variety, Hollywood Reporter, etc, and this is not surprising because this TV movie made little impact at the time and then disappeared. There are plenty of "viewer" reviews though (IMDb etc). Would these be acceptable to quote? What makes this movie notable for Wikipedia, IMHO, is that it featured two major stars, Patrick McGoohan and Lee Van Cleef, and has now become a cult movie attracting a lot of discussion (it is now available on DVD). I'd appreciate any advice! Thank you! -- Toby

Tobyhoward (talk) 19:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tobyhoward IMBD is not acceptable as a source as it is user-editable- even if it were, the reviews by ordinary people lack significance; we would need reviews by professional or at least recognized reviewers/critics. Note that a topic is typically not notable by association with notable people. 331dot (talk) 19:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

my identity

edit

this is who I am and I dont want people claiming my pictures or my birthday or my identity. this is the reason why im coming to wikiepedia because too many strangers are claiming to be me. 19:35:26, 28 February 2022 review of submission by Rosa Lopez Hurtado Rosa Lopez Hurtado (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


im Rosa Lopez Hurtado its my identity im not sharing my legacy with strangers. I just want respect Ive been disrespected and humilliated in facebook because alot of females want my pictures and they also want my identity. Rosa Lopez Hurtado (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does any of this have to do with the Wikipedia? ValarianB (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rosa Lopez Hurtado I think you are confused about what Wikipedia is. This is not social media for people to write about themselves; this is an encyclopedia where independent editors write about various topics. If you have issues with Facebook, please contact Facebook regarding them. If your identity is being stolen, please contact your local authorities. 331dot (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:34:25, 28 February 2022 review of submission by The Royal Kingdom of Igboland

edit

Hello. I am requesting assistance because my article was declines and the reason why doesn't make sense. The feedback was reliable, independent sources were needed however, this is exactly what I provided. Please help or review again. The Royal Kingdom of Igboland (talk) 22:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link Draft:Amaka The Igbo Princess --Orange Mike | Talk 01:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:45:21, 28 February 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Hemantshah19

edit


I am requesting assistance because I am still in my learning phase & I believe that this article on International Railway Summit is important for the global rail enthusiast as on this platform global railway leaders discuss the emerging rail technology and shaping the future rail industry.

[1]

https://shift2rail.org/calendar/international-railway-summit-3/

http://www.cer.be/events/international-events/10th-international-railway-summit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:3rd_International_Railway_Summit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2016_Christian_Kern_Railway_Summit.jpg

https://uic.org/com/enews/article/11th-international-railway-summit-to-debate-innovation-for-people-planet-and

https://www.railway-technology.com/features/new-trends-integrated-data-management-lessons-irs/

https://www.railway-technology.com/features/new-trends-integrated-data-management-lessons-irs/

https://www.railwaypro.com/wp/transport-leaders-reiterate-rail-transport-importance-to-fight-climate-change/

https://www.mobility.siemens.com/global/en/insights/railway-summit-2021-net-zero-mobility.html </ref> Hemantshah19 (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://europa.eu/year-of-rail/events/10th-international-railway-summit_en https://www.itf-oecd.org/international-railway-summit

Hemantshah19 (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23:26:20, 28 February 2022 review of submission by BuySomeApples

edit

Hi Folks! Is the reason this was rejected because I need new/different references? Or because the business is not that famous? PECO is a cornerstone in industrial die casting and has been a major Oregon Manufacturer since 1938. Thanks for any more feedback! :-) Mottsarah (talk) 23:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mottsarah, Its that the article includes zero independent reliable sources. Please see WP:NCORP for further information.Slywriter (talk) 23:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_February_28&oldid=1075471462"