Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 October 5

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< October 4 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 6 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 5

edit

05:15:57, 5 October 2021 review of submission by EdwinKibs

edit

Requesting help in editing this article because I have tried writing as an independent person but it seems there are elements of advertising which I have failed to tress out. Thank you

EdwinKibs (talk) 05:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EdwinKibs your draft was rejected. It means it won't be considered again for acceptance to be an WP page. GyanKnow contributions? 02:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:33:33, 5 October 2021 review of draft by Varshaji123

edit


I've created this article but I have an NPOV issue, in that Noone in the company was asked to create this article as a personal. I am not getting paid but wanted to run it by some other editors before I move it to the main space


Varshaji123 (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Varshaji123 Please read the advice left by reviewers. If you are employed by this festival, the Terms of Use require that to be disclosed, see WP:PAID. If you have an unpaid association with this festival, please review conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:15:45, 5 October 2021 review of submission by Eshamgd

edit


Eshamgd (talk) 10:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:07:24, 5 October 2021 review of submission by Laveatein

edit

Hello, I wrote an article but it got declined several times for different reasons, which exclude each other. Can you help me with it, please? I would like to know what kind of edits are necessary for the draft to be accepted. If such is possible, of course. Thank you in advance! --Laveatein (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laveatein The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about a company and what it does. A Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Sources like the company website, interviews with staff, announcments of routine business activities, press releases, and brief mentions do not establish notability.
If you have an association with this company, you must review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 12:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:40:58, 5 October 2021 review of submission by 122.168.167.34

edit


122.168.167.34 (talk) 12:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but the draft was clear advertising. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves. Please review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. 331dot (talk) 12:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you have an account, remember to log in before posting. 331dot (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:58:43, 5 October 2021 review of submission by Veproctor

edit

Could you please explain what you consider to be relevant references? As similar articles to mine, concerning very similar medical societies, have been published with fewer references. E.G. British_Thoracic_Society or British_Society_of_Gastroenterology. Can I reference the website itself? Veproctor (talk) 12:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those articles were never drafted by virtue of predating the drafting process' existence. Both also happen to have maintenance tags on them indicating they have issues. Our standards and enforcement thereof have only been toughening over the years. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:03:23, 5 October 2021 review of draft by Kashubro

edit


Hi there, I'm checking in on the progress of a page I (and a few others, it seems) have edited. It's the Kevin Nicholson Businessman page. Could you let me know why the page isn't public/out of draft mode? Thank you!

Kashubro (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kashubro, you didn't submit the draft for a review after your last set of changes, probably that's why it is still in the draftspace. Regardless, as a politician, he has yet to meet the notability guidelines for politicians. As a businessman, his activities thus far are not standing out as notable as well. I noted that he receives a Bronze Star Medal. However, as a non-US person, I won't comment on the notability of him being awarded. – robertsky (talk) 16:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:37:39, 5 October 2021 review of draft by Dixiebella

edit


The page I have developed has been moved to DRAFT: MAINE COAST HERITAGE TRUST. Is this page, as a draft, still under review for possible addition to Wikipedia? Dixiebella (talk) 18:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's been reviewed and declined. Laws are not acceptable sources, and nor is anything the subject controls. Your offline sources are missing required bibliographical information (page numbers for the periodicals, page numbers and ISBNs/OCLC#s for the books). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:32:50, 5 October 2021 review of draft by Howdyfreshhhhh

edit


Which one of my references are not considered reliable sources?

Howdyfreshhhhh (talk) 19:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been paying attention to literally anything said to you on this page? Any further requests will be reverted off unless and until you actually read the feedback you've gotten and take it on-board. We are not obligated to repeat ourselves ad nauseam to someone who refuses to listen. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:43:52, 5 October 2021 review of submission by NicoleMASD

edit

Hello! I have added several citations to aid in the establishment of notability. Can you please take a look and let me know your thoughts?

NicoleMASD (talk) 22:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 22:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_October_5&oldid=1049293722"