Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 October 13

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< October 12 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 14 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 13

edit

Request on 01:12:52, 13 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by TDG775

edit


Hi, I am trying to create a page for Davie Fogarty. An entrepreneur from Australia. At only 26 he has achieved a great amount and I felt he should have a Wikipedia page. I sourced content from online articles I found. This is my first article. Any help is highly appreciated.

TDG775 (talk) 01:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TDG775: The sources you have are almost all worthless, with only the 9news source being usable. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 02:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:28:01, 13 October 2021 review of submission by Thenethfarious

edit


Thanks for the feedback! Have made edits. For review, please!

Thenethfarious (talk) 05:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thenethfarious. Rejection is meant to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). Adding a source that has two sentences about it raising capital (a type of coverage explicitly excluded as trivial by the corporate notability guideline) doesn't change that. No amount of editing can fix the problem, so volunteers do not intend to review the draft again. Wikipedia may not be used for any kind of advertising, promotion, or public relations. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:25:24, 13 October 2021 review of draft by 2806:103E:1C:2DA8:79D7:8080:9589:B45F

edit


greetings, i would like help, because i wanted to add this fangame to wikipedia, there is a lot of confusion about it & people don't know what are the history & versions of it are available.

i would like the article to be like the AM2R (the metroid unoficial remake), so it can also be included as a reference to the Night Slashers arcade article. these night slashers fan remakes seem to be good works, but it was hard for me to keep track of what versions are the most current, so it would be nice for wikipedia to feature them in some capacity. thanks in advance. 2806:103E:1C:2DA8:79D7:8080:9589:B45F (talk) 08:25, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is that AM2R got coverage as a consequence of both the Game Awards nod and Nintendo's DMCA takedown request on it both being reported on. Unless this fangame has anything similar, it's not going to cut it as an article. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:44, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:18:37, 13 October 2021 review of submission by Kevinw33

edit


Kevinw33 (talk) 15:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this team meets the notability based on Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability

Kevinw33 Fixed the link, the whole URL is not necessary. That league seems to not be a fully professional league. 331dot (talk) 15:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
331dot Individual player notability requires professionalism, however, team notability for US teams requires either full professional or participation in the "national cup" which is the US Open Cup. That is listed here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability
Kevinw33Again, you don't need the whole URL. Then you will need to appeal to the last reviewer with that information. 331dot (talk) 15:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:33:07, 13 October 2021 review of submission by Gloriajjoz

edit

I would love help as to why this draft was declined. This is a notable topic as Ojivolta has a few secondary sources, as listed in the references. Is there supposed to be a certain amount of secondary sources? How many sources should there be exactly in order to be considered a notable topic? I have seen pages that have minimal sources but have been published. Let me know, thank you! Gloriajjoz (talk) 17:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TSIS is too sparse to be any good, and GQ is barely any better. Neither source are usable. We're looking for (both) at least three independent, in-depth sources with editorial control and at least one independent, in-depth source with editorial control for each and every biographical claim that could be challenged. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gloriajjoz: re-signing for ping. working through first cup of coffee, bear with me —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 18:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:56:54, 13 October 2021 review of draft by TFSBS-SH

edit


Please let me know why the article is Submission declined, and I hope you can help me to edit it so that the process can be completed TFSBS-SH (talk) 19:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's currently at Draft:Muna Khalid Albader. Read and answer the comments there. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_October_13&oldid=1050726670"