Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 June 9
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < June 8 | << May | June | Jul >> | June 10 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
June 9
edit09:39:01, 9 June 2021 review of submission by 96.246.176.64
edit
96.246.176.64 (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
I would like to know why the article is considered "blatant advertising" while it only listed the facts of formation of the TraxComm by MTR Corporation as a subsidiary, and what it offers as a major wholesale telecommunications service provider in Hong Kong!
Please advise what should be amended to make this article qualified for Wikipedia. Many thanks! Raphael WLC Chow (talk) 09:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Raphael WLC Chow Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about a company. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. Wikipedia has no interest in what a company says about itself or just basic information. Press releases, announcements of routine business activities, staff interviews, brief mentions, and other primary sources do not establish notability. As your draft was rejected, it will not be considered further and no amount of editing can change that. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
17:21:53, 9 June 2021 review of draft by Farhan Rana Rajpoot Youtube
edit
Farhan Rana Rajpoot Youtube (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
17:42:25, 9 June 2021 review of submission by Ashish Sasatte
edit
https://ashishsasatte.tech (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- This page has been since been deleted for being a blatant advertisement. Let us know if you have any questions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
20:22:37, 9 June 2021 review of draft by Davebillo
edit
I now understand the need for verifiable references. I have now added some to the draft. Before I resubmit for consideration of publication, I would like to know if a third party (other than myself and the submission editor) believes I have reached an adequate bar for publication. The subject is a very accomplished and well-traveled musician with dozens of credits, but many of them have not been publicized. A cursory Google search of him brings up many more references than I've included on the page for him, for fear that they would be considered less robust blog type postings. Thank you in advance for your help and I look forward to re-submitting the page for consideration soon.
Davebillo (talk) 20:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Davebillo I did a little cleanup for you, but the sourcing is still insufficient to show notability. You need profile articles about him, rather than those in which he is just mentioned. TechnoTalk (talk) 02:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
21:32:21, 9 June 2021 review of submission by Mill Mountain Digital Agency
editWe are not sure what we did wrong. All we did was post a bio about our CEO? Could you please elaborate? The link is unclear. Mill Mountain Digital Agency (talk) 21:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Courtesy FYI for other page stalkers that the account was already blocked. TechnoTalk (talk) 02:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
21:37:30, 9 June 2021 review of submission by Atena ak2
editHello; I edited my draft for Arsha Aghdasi, which should be linked to the Persian page fa:ارشا اقدسی, and tried to choose reliable resources. So I wonder if I could ask you to re-review my article, help me to improve and accept if possible? Thanks Atena ak2 (talk) 21:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)