Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 September 24

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< September 23 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 25 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 24

edit

05:05:24, 24 September 2018 review of submission by Anirudh 2057

edit


Anirudh 2057 (talk) 05:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

05:43:59, 24 September 2018 review of draft by FifthHouseGuy

edit


FifthHouseGuy (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some one please review this draft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tony_Ashai

09:01:42, 24 September 2018 review of draft by Farooqqammar12

edit


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dolmen_Malls this my article Check my article i updated it, its 100% pure free from advertisement and this is very famous mall in karachi so kindly check it again. Farooqqammar12 (talk) 09:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Farooqqammar12 Greetings . The draft article reads like an advertisement. See comment and pls rework. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:11:35, 24 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Letsmakewikigreat

edit


Hello,

I have resubmitted an article: Technology Hub Juarez (first submitted two months ago). The writing has been shortened. edited and cut for neutrally. I am keen to know whether I have made a worthy contribution to wiki.

Simon Letsmakewikigreat (talk) 09:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Letsmakewikigreat Greetings. You article has been reviewed by Theroadislong. Kindly read the message on the draft page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09:54:50, 24 September 2018 review of draft by Letsmakewikigreat

edit


Good Afternoon- a new and extremely short and straight forward new draft was just submitted of Technology Hub Ciudad Juarez. I am expect it is now (or close) to being a worthy wiki contribution.

Regards



Letsmakewikigreat (talk) 09:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09:56:16, 24 September 2018 review of draft by Sylviahoikka

edit


A reviewer has said that the page I am trying to post does not have sufficient secondary sources, can this be more clearly explained. Because I have seen pages about similar companies as the one I am writing about with less sources or same amount of sources as I have provided. So I would just like some clarification on what exactly is missing so that the page can be pushed forward to be published. Thanks.

Sylviahoikka (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sylviahoikka see WP:CORPDEPTH. For a company to be notable, it must have multiple pieces of indepth coverage. There does not appear to be enough indepth coverage on the company for notability, and No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. However you can continue looking for indepth coverage for notability. There are many articles on companies on wikipedia that need to be deleted; that there are other articles that are worse doesn't mean this article meets standards for acceptance. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:18, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10:10:07, 24 September 2018 review of draft by Setec (musical artist)

edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Setec_(musical_artist)/sandbox

I submitted the above page for review earlier today, in the interests of creating a public article. When I created an account I chose the username "Setec (musical artist)", because there was seemingly no other way to use this as the name of the article.

My submission was rejected very quickly, by Frayae, with the message "Don't write about yourself" and a link to Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest policy.

I was not writing about myself. I am not Setec. I provided several reputable secondary sources. I object to this unnecessarily quick rejection and the reasons provided for it. I put a lot of work into this submission and resent the misguided and condescending manner in which I was rejected. I will state again: I was not writing about myself.

I have not found any avenue of complaint or right of reply apart from this page I am currently writing on. A response as soon as possible from a Wikipedia representative would be greatly appreciated, as would a review of my rejection and a reconsideration of my submission, which falls comfortably within all Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thank you, Alexander — Preceding unsigned comment added by Setec (musical artist) (talk • contribs) 10:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:00:17, 24 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Muukifar

edit


I have added two paragraphs including two sources: footnotes 6 and 9: an interview with The Baltimore Sun (newspaper) and an excerpt from a book that studies the Hare Krishna movement. As the subject (Mahanidhi Swami) does not travel from the village in which he lives, he might not attract so much publicity from different sources. Nevertheless, his influence and the importance of his contribution through his books and lectures, made him one of the authorities for those interested in Gaudiya Vaishnavism. This can be proven by the book sales, the traffic on his website and views on SoundCloud. Muukifar (talk) 18:00, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • You need to add many more references from newspapers, and be aware that a reviewer will not consider sources such as Soundcloud, his website, or his publishers book sales statistics. This is because they are considered to be primary sources, you can read WP:RS for more information. 18:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

18:31:04, 24 September 2018 review of draft by Cvizents

edit


Hello, I have requested a un-deletion of a page that I was originally trying to publish a year ago Shanlon Wu. While I was waiting on a verdict I was lead to believe I could work on another draft of it in my User profile that would not affect anything because it was separate. It has already been flagged for not being noteable, which I am working on. I thought my User space was a place I was able to continue editing without fear of deletion?


What should I do? Should I delete everything and start over?

Cvizents (talk) 18:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you submit a userpage which appears to be a duplicate of a draft it complicates matters. You can safely work on a userspace page, but you should when finished update the draft and submit the draft. If you submit the userspace page as you did, then reviewers will treat it as a duplicate draft because that's what it then is. You should in future be submitting Draft:Shanlon Wu. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:12:11, 24 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Wrestlingtracks1

edit



Wrestlingtracks1 (talk) 20:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:21:46, 24 September 2018 review of draft by ThortheProblemSolver

edit 
Why are users going into my sandbox and submitting articles to AFC? I didnt submit it or request it..?

ThortheProblemSolver (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2018_September_24&oldid=861801600"