Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 March 18

Help desk
< March 17 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 19 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 18

edit

11:25:30, 18 March 2018 review of submission by Arno Hazekamp

edit


Hello. I want to ask about AK-47 article submission. I have rewrited information from table at http://www.ncsm.nl/strain/ak-47 page and included it into the article. Should I use another source? Or I can just remove referencing? Arno Hazekamp (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arno Hazekamp. The draft is very short, and cites a single source. Therefore the topic would be more appropriate as a sub-section of Cannabis strains#Varieties than as a stand alone article. If the sub-section grows large enough, with well-sourced information, it could be spun-out into a stand alone article in the future. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Worldbruce. I saw this strain in List of names for cannabis, so decided to add article for it. How large article should be?
@Arno Hazekamp:. Guideline Wikipedia:Article size contains some relevant information. I would not spinout AK-47 until that sub-section has grown so large that it overwhelms the rest of the varieties section. There is no exact answer, but I would say it should be at least twice as long as the Charlotte's Web sub-section before it would be worth spinning out. More importantly, it should reference at least three in-depth reliable sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:40:04, 18 March 2018 review of submission by Tialaramex

edit


When people search for "62 Group" they get shown an anti-fascists. Who are awesome, but also ceased to exist a long time ago. The 62 Group of Textile Artists still exists, it'd be nice if Wikipedia suggested that might be what they're looking for. I have seen two different things on Wikipedia, is one or other of them a good choice here?

1. Mentioning the other article in each page, saying e.g. "This article is about the anti-fascist group, for the artistic collective, see 62 Group of Textile Artists"

2. A disambiguation page which lists all the things the reader might be looking for under the name "62 Group" (currently two things, but maybe there are others?)

Tialaramex (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:47:36, 18 March 2018 review of submission by Bhusyma

edit


Bhusyma (talk) 22:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]