Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 November 8
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 7 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 9 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 8
edit00:56:43, 8 November 2014 review of submission by Deemington
edit
Resolved- Deemington (talk · contribs)
Hello, I've noticed that my submission which is pending review is now in the very old category. I have seen a notification about a large backlog and just wanted to clarify that it is not because of something on my end. Many thanks.
Deemington (talk) 00:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Deemington. Been published. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
12:31:10, 8 November 2014 request for review by Navychick84
edit Resolved- Navychick84 (talk · contribs)
Hi, I am doing this entry for my mother-in-law as a 90th birthday present. She is aware that I am doing this and has reviewed my draft submission. Is there anything else I need to do?
Navychick84 (talk) 12:31, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
- Published after adding a few cites, needs cleanup. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
15:50:12, 8 November 2014 review of submission by 71.174.9.48
edit- 71.174.9.48 (talk · contribs)
71.174.9.48 (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello I am J N Dahal. I recently share the article on the topic " Author Dilli Ram Sharma Acharya ". Can you review this important article about a famous Bhutanese Nepali Writer. I would kindly like to say please can you check it.
Please have a good review and let me know what else is needed for the supporting contribution for this article.
link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilli_Ram_Sharma_Acharya
18:30:33, 8 November 2014 review of submission by 141.136.251.218
edit
Being a regular user of Wikipedia, i succumbed to the invitation to contribute something:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Introduction
"Don't be afraid to edit – anyone can edit almost every page, and we are encouraged to be bold! Find something that can be improved and make it better—for example, spelling, grammar, rewriting for readability, adding content, or removing non-constructive edits. If you wish to add new facts, please try to provide references so they may be verified, or suggest them on the article's discussion page."
Apparently that is not so in practice, so I give up.
Compare my 20-minutes "seed article" with the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palcrypt I think my "seed" was at least as good, and good enough for others to build on top of it. I don't plan to spend my life expanding on it. And it's no worse than: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/AxCrypt
Need more than three references about AxCrypt?
Need "notability"?
Bye! There, another 20 minutes wasted..
--A user (and not a contributor) of Wikipedia (or AxCrypt).