Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 26

November 26 edit

Template:Ghislaine Maxwell edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template has nothing to offer but a list of her relatives, which are already included in the main article's infobox, and a single charity, which is discussed in the body of the main article. I think it serves no purpose in terms of grouping related articles and could possibly be deleted. Keivan.fTalk 22:46, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Linguistic groups of the constitutionally recognised official languages of India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can't see any reason for this to exist except an urge to link everything everywhere. PepperBeast (talk) 20:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Womens Rugby Tournament edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Olympic tables edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All are no longer used as they have been substituted on the articles of relevance as single-use templates. No longer needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:49, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Literatures of the Indian constitutionally recognised official languages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:04, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what t he point of this template is, and a particular author has been inserting it into articles that already have the perfectly adequate Indian literature template. PepperBeast (talk) 13:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree that there's no need to have one template for the literatures of India and another just for those that are in the official languages. Whether a given language happens to have been included in the 8th schedule of the constitution isn't relevant here. – Uanfala (talk) 13:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).