Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 29

Rugby outgoing tour squads

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We only have navboxes like this for major tournaments, not annual tours, otherwise we would have dozens of navboxes for teams every single year. There is nothing especially notable about the 1993 Japan touring squad or the 1988/1994 Samoa touring squads. – PeeJay 12:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

South Africa rugby squads

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have templates like these for any other nation. National team squads are temporary in nature, coming together only for specific tournaments or sets of games before disbanding again. Some players may be centrally contracted to their national rugby union, but this isn't the case for all of them and this also isn't what these navboxes are reflecting, especially in the case of the sevens squad. – PeeJay 12:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both These were the work of MightyPeanut and were fine when he was regularly editing. However he no longer edits and these templates haven't been maintained, and there is no other real full-time SA rugby editor to keep up with them and so they are out of date. We don't keep them for other international nations as the Nom has said so I see no reason why we need them. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, overkill. Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

to be deleted, invalid name (should be in singular), unused Estopedist1 (talk) 07:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).