Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 20

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 19 January 21 >

January 20 edit

Template:2014 ASEAN Para Games medal table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 per the request of the template's creator. –Grondemar 06:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only linked on page, therefore a template is unnecessary. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox rugby league team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Primefac (talk) 00:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template provides almost identical content to Template:Infobox rugby league club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and there seems little point in having two templates providing the same output. Any parameters not in this template could easily be added to the merged template. Nthep (talk)

Would someone be willing to work on this to merge the two and avoid data being lost in a merge. Don't know enough about these myself to attempt it myself though.Fleets (talk) 19:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this goes through I'll do it. Nthep (talk) 20:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge as above, silly having two templates for same thing. Bwfcwarrior (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox eSports organization edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge, retaining functionality Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox eSports organization with Template:Infobox sports team.
mostly redundant, and it would be nice for more parameters to be supported--Prisencolin (talk) 00:35, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Don't Merge. eSports has nothing to do with regular athletic sports. {{Infobox sports team}} should be deleted instead, if it isn't used. ∞ Target360YT ∞ (talk · contribs) 07:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • For the record, Target360YT/t, IB sports is used 1600 times, with IB eSports only used 124. Primefac (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • It would use a lot of the same parameters. Also, since eSports games aren't universally called "sports", the parameter specifying the specific sport in Infobox:Sports team should be changed to allow "game" to be listed.--Prisencolin (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Esports at its core is a sport. --J36miles (talk) 21:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't merge - Most eSport teams are not run like traditional sporting clubs, but more like organizations with divisions that compete in them instead. I don't think the two are similar enough to combine into one infobox, although I would be fine if some of the additional parameters were also merged into infobox sports team. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 09:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • although I would be fine if some of the additional parameters were also merged into infobox sports team that's what merge means. Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • merge, retaining functionality. Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PIHA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. I see most of the pages are up for deletion, so NPASR if the number of bluelinks drops below acceptable levels. Primefac (talk) 00:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial and non-notable pages. WP:EXISTING violation. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep for now. I have refactored it to remove the majority of the redlinks, but it is still connecting about ten articles. if majority of the articles are deleted, then clearly this should be deleted as well. Frietjes (talk) 00:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 13:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Media General edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 01:11, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nexstar Broadcasting Group has completed its merger of Media General on January 17. It is now known as Nexstar Media Group. All the MG stations are listed on the Nexstar templates, and the spun-off stations are on its respective spun-off entities's templates, thus no needing this template since the company is now defunct. Csworldwide1 (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bulgaria Squad EuroBasket 2009 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 28 Primefac (talk) 00:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Baba Yadav edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 28 Primefac (talk) 00:22, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indefblocked-global edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Primefac (talk) 00:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Locked global account. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nomination. The template is entirely redundant and very scarcely used. The thirteen transclusions of it that exist should be replaced with Template:Locked global account. Mr rnddude (talk) 06:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cc-sa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 28 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:31, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_20&oldid=1086338182"