Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 October 26

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< October 25 October 27 >

October 26

edit

Template:Latest stable software release/Advanced SystemCare

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless template, used as boilerplate in only one article (and that itself is of dubious notability). Subst: it in and then delete it. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you realize it, but many Wikipedia pages on software applications use similar templates and, as far as I know, all of such templates are only linked to subject article. You could argue that THIS template is pointless, but then you would have to argue that ALL such templates are useless. In that case, you will be starting on a crusade against a whole pile of Wikipedia articles that use a similar template. In that case, you should raise the question of whether or not Wikipedia should use such templates or not ... as a class issue. See for example:
Enquire (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Then don't delete {{LSR}}, which refers to a notable piece of software. Do you have anything relevant to add about this template? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zambales/color

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and hard to see how this will help "promote consistent coloring for all California navigational boxes" Frietjes (talk) 13:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zhengzhou Adm

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 02:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates the map in Zhengzhou#Administration and demography Frietjes (talk) 13:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zhengzhou Metro/Line 1

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 02:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and broken Frietjes (talk) 13:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zhongyuan

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 4 (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zimbabwe squad - 2013 FIBA Africa Championship for Women

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 02:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

all red links Frietjes (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Frietjes: I don't know enough about notability in relation to basketball, but the question here is are they red-linked because they are not notable or because they haven't been created yet? --SuperJew (talk) 13:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SuperJew, they finished at the bottom of group A that year. and there is no article for the team itself. if anyone wants to know the members of the squad, they can go to 2013 FIBA Africa Championship for Women squads. Frietjes (talk) 14:00, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zoos of Armenia

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

does not provide a sufficient amount of navigation (only one entry) Frietjes (talk) 13:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also category only has one page. --SuperJew (talk) 13:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zoos of Cyprus

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 02:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

all red links. Frietjes (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sport Club Corinthians Paulista squad 2000 FIFA Club World Championship

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 4 (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SZSECI

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 4 (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clube Atlético Mineiro squad 2013 FIFA Club World Cup

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 4 ~ Rob13Talk 02:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_26&oldid=747863916"