Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 19

June 19

Template:Miss Mexico Organization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. The single article that was linked from here was deleted, on the assumption that we do not need yearly articles. Thus this template has no articles to link. - Nabla (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Miss Mexico Organization (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with just one link and that article is at AFD. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Markaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:57, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

• Template:Markaz (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was created solely for the purpose of promoting a particular institution. I do not see any particular need for this template. It was created recently by a sockpuppet (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shafinusri) who has now been blocked. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

• Keep Despite what the nom says, it actually looks like a good and useful navigation template. There are a lot of non-linked pages which should be removed, but a nav box for a university isn't unheard of. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 14:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. A lot of these articles need to be taken to AfD. It appears this sock created a bit of a walled garden here. ~ Rob^Talk 06:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I've looked into it more and made an AfD nom and a handful of CfD noms. There's certainly more to go. This is a mess. ~ Rob^Talk 06:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is unclear, and AfD is unclear. Giving more time
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per WP:DENY. The template was created by a sockpuppet....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).