Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 11

June 11

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox template with only a single entry. There were many more before my two recent edits, but they linked to redirects (back to the church/band) article, were redlinks, linked to a song not an album and it was unrelated to the subject or was a circular link because it started with a hash tag and no target could be found. With only one entry in the template, it makes no sense to keep it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:41, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXISTING -- there are three links, one of which is a redirect to the main university article and this box is not in... not enough to navigate! 🎓 Corkythehornetfan 🎓 01:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXISTING -- there are only two links which this navbox is in... not enough to navigate! 🎓 Corkythehornetfan 🎓 01:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).