Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 April 22

< April 21	April 23 >

April 22 edit

Template:GFW Global Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed (non-admin closure). ~ Rob^Talk 01:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GFW Global Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A navigational template with only one article. Can be recreated when there have been a few more champions. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 16:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Civil Service Examination-India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure). ~ Rob^Talk 01:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Civil Service Examination-India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The items listed as Exam, CSAT and Mains won't have standalone articles and those given as Services are already covered by {{Public Services of India}}. Skr15081997 (talk) 11:13, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gaisano edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. There is significant precedent that navboxes with only a few links are deleted, and redlinks should not appear in navboxes most of the time (see WP:EXISTING, which is in an essay, but does represent the repeated consensus at TfD). (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 01:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gaisano (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No useful navigation; navigates only three articles. Sixth o f March 05:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I admit its not very useful for navigation but think it makes up for it in the red links which are useful for its preponderating info. Hawaan12 (talk) 11:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb team Misr Lel Makasa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Fb team Misr Lel Makkasa (non-admin closure). ~ Rob^Talk 01:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team Misr Lel Makasa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is already a template for the club, so we don't need this template. Ben5218 (talk) 00:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

merge/redirect. Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Decades in the 20th century edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete (non-admin closure). ~ Rob^Talk 01:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Decades in the 20th century (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The decades and centuries can already be found in the Decadebox template, so we don't need this template. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, completely unnecessary. --Skr15081997 (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).