Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 11
January 11 edit
Template:Tennis events 3 edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close per previous TfDs Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Tennis events 3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No page use this template. (Regions Morgan Keegan Championships and the Cellular South Cup redirected to another article) 333-blue 05:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Procedural closeComment: This template is already being merged into {{Tennis events}}. (See yesterday's log.) Also, there do seem to be transclusions. I don't know about the redirects mentioned by the nom, but if this really shouldn't be used, then I don't need to worry about merging it. I'll take a break on that, while this is in discussion... —PC-XT+ 06:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC) I changed this to a comment, in case the template can be deleted so I don't need to merge it. Haha. I doubt that, though. Regions Morgan Keegan Championships and the Cellular South Cup was redirected, and many of the other transclusions couldbe trimmed down to omit the last part of the titleonly display either the men's or women's competition, instead of both, but I am not sure if that would be appropriate for all. —PC-XT+ 08:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC) 09:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)- WikiProject Tennis has been notified of this discussion as part of asking for review of my merge —PC-XT+ 08:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy procedural close was just discussed on a 2015 January 10 TFD -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- I would support that, even though I struck it as my !vote. (I'm the one who closed January 10's discussion, since it already has a verdict of merge from March 30, 2014.) This discussion is a little different, as it is for deleting the template, instead of merging it, but I don't mind simply completing the merge. Basically, the only thing left to merge is the coloring, which probably wouldn't take too long. (You can see the section for this template among these testcases.) —PC-XT+ 07:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 07:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Let's keep this simple. Since I did start the merge, this could be redirected after I complete merging the colors. There should be no difference in parameters, as the default
|type=now handles it, making it entirely redundant. (I made that change since this discussion started, but could revert it again if necessary.) —PC-XT+ 03:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)- The Tennis events sandbox now supports the colors from this template, as well, so this should just be redirected after syncing the sandbox/checking testcases, unless the discussion goes a different direction. (I added the background2/foreground2 colors to {{Infobox tennis event/color}} in 2 edits which should also be undone if this discussion changes.) —PC-XT+ 05:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Let's keep this simple. Since I did start the merge, this could be redirected after I complete merging the colors. There should be no difference in parameters, as the default
- I would support that, even though I struck it as my !vote. (I'm the one who closed January 10's discussion, since it already has a verdict of merge from March 30, 2014.) This discussion is a little different, as it is for deleting the template, instead of merging it, but I don't mind simply completing the merge. Basically, the only thing left to merge is the coloring, which probably wouldn't take too long. (You can see the section for this template among these testcases.) —PC-XT+ 07:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC) 07:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.