Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 April 18

< April 17	April 19 >

April 18

Template:Lesenswert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lesenswert (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There was previous consensus that duplicates of {{Iw-ref}} should be deleted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 17#Category:Interwiki translation templates, but this one got missed. It is only currently used on user drafts, not on any articles. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 21:23, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete, I am the one who removed it from the articles, after making sure that {{translated page}} was on the talk page. Frietjes (talk) 13:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chechen people mosaic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chechen people mosaic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now merged with the article. problematic due to the fact that non-free images can't be used in templates (see edit history). Frietjes (talk) 16:32, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, too many images. Hajme 04:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Spicy Effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Spicy Effect (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

provides little useful navigation, and record label templates are generally deprecated. Frietjes (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Record label rosters are unsuitable for navboxes anyway, but as this only has two links, it's also pointless. --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Lyon Metro icon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lyon Metro icon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Rail-interchange}} (which this template is now a wrapper of). Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:43, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.