Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 June 3

< June 2	June 4 >

June 3 edit

Template:Edit notice discussion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 June 12 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox venue edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge theatre into venue. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox venue (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox theatre (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox venue with Template:Infobox theatre.
Similar templates; overlapping uses. (Eventual merger was supported by several commenters at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 May 5#Template:Infobox venue). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if these are merged, it should not merge into theatre, as not all venues are theatres. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There is a significant difference between a theatre and Michigan Stadium. I don't see how they should be merged in the slightest.UCO2009bluejay (talk) 23:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Unless you mean to merge theatre into venue then I would withdraw my oppose vote.UCO2009bluejay (talk) 23:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

US Congress

Support merging Infobox theatre into Infobox venue (not the other way round). Theaters, arenas, stadiums etc. are places where people go to sit and watch things. Concerts could be held in any of them. They may or may not be roofed, may have tiered seating etc. Presumably political assembly halls also qualify as venues. They often have balconies for spectators, and at least in a small town the same hall could be used for council meetings and concerts. How about churches? They can be used for concerts as well as for services, and may have much the same design as theaters, lighting, sound systems etc. I don't think mosques would fit - they seem more a place for quiet worship, with no seating or stage. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support merging Infobox theatre into Infobox venue (not the other way round) as per previous comments. "Venue" does seem to be the more general concept. 134.134.137.75 (talk) 00:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Phantogram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Phantogram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates three album articles along with main article (Discography link is to an anchor within the main article). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. Deepblue1 (talk) 16:20, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:18, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete, the articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 14:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.