Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 7

< July 6	July 8 >

July 7 edit

Template:Miss Asia Pacific World edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:CSD#G8 connected with the corresponding AfD. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miss Asia Pacific World (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This AfD resulted in all of the year-specific articles to be merged into the main article, therefore this template has only one article to link to. As such, this template should be deleted. Neelix (talk) 20:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mujeeb Mustafa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per WP:CSD#G2. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:59, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mujeeb Mustafa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not a template. Mar4d (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete Frietjes (talk) 18:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TinctureViolation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TinctureViolation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This inline template marks coats of arms in articles with the text "There is a violation of the rule of tincture : these arms are 'illegal' heraldry." This is OR/SYNTH. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 02:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:Systematic bias, this template assumes that Europe rules the world. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are no 'rules' in heraldry, and certainly nothing which makes any arms 'illegal.' Grande (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FalseArms edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FalseArms (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This inline template marks coats of arms in articles with the text "These arms violate the rules of heraldry." This is OR/SYNTH. Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 02:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:Systematic bias this template assumes that coats of arms have rules, and originate from a culture where such rules are enforced. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are no 'rules' in heraldry, and certainly nothing which makes any arms 'illegal.' Grande (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.