Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 18

< February 17	February 19 >

February 18 edit

Template:Discount edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:47, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Discount (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

With only two directly related articles to the topic article, navigation between is already a single click away from one another. No need for a navbox in this case. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also, not about discount -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: With the new article for their final album Crash Diagnostic being questioned for notability, and the first album not even having an article, I'd say this is a band that does not need a navigation template for a guide. Fylbecatulous talk 14:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nanny McPhee films edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nanny McPhee films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Currently only navigates between 2 pages. Even with 3, it wouldn't justify a navbox. Axem Titanium (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete and replace with links in a see also section. Frietjes (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.