Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 November 19

November 19

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mayors of Tacloban City (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Whats the use of a template if its all empty links? This thing will find better use in a section in the main article. --RioHondo (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:San Jose del Monte City Barangays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox does not seem warranted. Navigates between two pages only. --RioHondo (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Eastern Visayas Provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Region VIII Eastern Visayas}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cordillera Administrative Region Provinces (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to {{Cordillera Administrative Region}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Region XII SOCCSKSARGEN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{SOCCSKSARGEN}}. --RioHondo (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Calamba City Barangays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough articles to warrant a template. Links to only three. --RioHondo (talk) 14:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EDSA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete for the same reasons as Template:South Luzon Expressway and Template:North Luzon Expressway: Mostly a collection of links of cities, landmarks and intersections thru which the road runs. I mean what's the point? Not everything needs a navbox. --RioHondo (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Major Malls in Laguna (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A template that supposedly aims to navigate "malls and supermarkets" but only links a handful of articles. The rest of template is basically just a list. Much of the rational behind this nomination can be found at WP:NENAN (even though it's technically just an essay and not a guideline). It all boils down to if this template is actually necessary and useful in the first place. Xeltran (talk) 01:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Phantogram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too few blue links (the duo's main page, one album, one EP) to warrant a navbox at this time (WP:NENAN).  Gongshow Talk 09:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.