Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 December 19

December 19 edit


Unused Canadian party colour templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/BC Party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canadian politics/party colours/BC Party/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Grey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Grey/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Platinum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Platinum/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canadian politics/party colours/RefedBC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Canadian politics/party colours/RefedBC/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Co-operative Commonwealth Federation/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Liberal Party of Newfoundland and Labrador/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:New Democratic Party (Canada)/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Social Credit Party of Canada/meta/color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I've had 195 of these party colour templates deleted through speedy deletion, but it was requested that I start nominating them instead. None of these are being used on any page. All of their functionality can be replicated by Template:Canadian party colour. There is no reason to keep them for substitution because that would defeat the goal of standardizing colours. There is no reason to keep them for their histories because they have had few-to-no edits and few-to-no mentions on talk pages. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 22:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.