Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 17

< April 16	April 18 >

April 17 edit

Template:Ranks and insignia St John Ambulance/Officer/ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:29, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ranks and insignia St John Ambulance/Officer/ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used by any article and appears completely broken Tom B (talk) 00:47, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it looks like an old-style pre-parserfunction template that forms part of a table with other templates. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This Tfd should also include Template:Ranks and insignia St John Ambulance/OR/.

Delete both as per nom. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:New York City Department of Correction edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New York City Department of Correction (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used in any article, also looks completely broken Tom B (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no need for a template for DOC only. There are not enough articles that we could link to just yet...or not enough I am aware of I should say since many Commissioners of the past may have articles. I would support it if it was better organized, but not like this. Arnabdas (talk) 19:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Govtrack edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:31, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Govtrack (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Scientus, this was only used one article so not clear that it's necessary, regards Tom B (talk) 00:40, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused and redundant. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.