Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 27

< December 26	December 28 >

December 27

Template:Codifiednavbar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Codifiednavbar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{navbar}} and no use to speak of. — Edokter • Talk — 01:39, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:New York expand section

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. G7: One author who has requested deletion in this discussion, and the template was not in use anywhere. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New York expand section (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly specific expansion template. {{Expand-section}} works just fine. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:35, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The whole point of this template was to put the New York-related articles in a category where they wouldn't get "lost" amongst the thousands of other articles that need expansion. However, I never use the category, and I also never use the template anymore. While we're at it, the template and category could probably be speedied under G7. – T M F 06:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete (G7) per TMF. (It would be a job for a category, even if the functionality was still needed.) I've tagged the category for CSD as well. TheFeds 18:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bus-sectexpand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:30, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bus-sectexpand (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly specific subtemplate of {{expand}} which is currently being deleted. Minimal amount of transclusions. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:35, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment template: expand section is not being deleted. 184.144.160.77 (talk) 05:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
delete and replace with {{expand section}} 184.144.160.77 (talk) 05:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and replace with {{expand section}}, or just redirect if that's easier. No need for a subject-specific template in this case. Alzarian16 (talk) 16:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: inconsistent format and no need for specific template. Once that's complete, someone can come along with AWB and replace it. TheFeds 19:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tcexpand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tcexpand (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly-specific subtemplate of {{expand}}, which is currently being deleted at TFD. Only 7 transclusions. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:34, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment {{expand}} is up at DRV, and it's not a sure endorse yet. 184.144.160.77 (talk) 05:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It can still be replaced with {{expand-section}}. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or {{Incomplete}}. SnottyWong ^confer 00:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no need for specific template. Replace with {{expand section}}, {{incomplete}} or other WP:TC templates as appropriate. TheFeds 19:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.