Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 May 25

< Wikipedia:Templates for deletion‎ | Log
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 May 25)
< May 24 May 26 >

May 25 edit

Template:TheRedgraveFamily edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 00:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TheRedgraveFamily (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is barely a template, it is just a group of links that are already contained in the article on which this template was used (Vanessa Redgrave) and has no other function. We don't have templates for actors and there are no other existing "family" templates of which I'm aware. I see no purpose for it. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - not used anywhere, and shouldn't be. This can be added into an article directly, but generally family information should be written out as text anyway. Robofish (talk) 01:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not a useful template and contains so little information that it should be placed directly in articles that need it. |→ Spaully₪† 16:40, 29 May 2009 (GMT)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:J. R. Writer edit

Template:J. R. Writer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G8 as parent article was just deleted, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC) Only one album by rap artist Cosprings (talk) 15:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - not enough articles for a navigational template. Robofish (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cantonese-tjp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 02:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cantonese-tjp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is no longer used in any article. Also, Template:Chinese and Template:Chinese-inline can do everything that this template does. - Alan (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cantonese-tsijp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 02:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cantonese-tsijp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is no longer used in any article. Also, Template:Chinese and Template:Chinese-inline can do everything that this template does. - Alan (talk) 12:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment {{Chinese}} does NOT do anything like the template under discussion. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 03:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There's something wrong with {{Chinese-inline}} ... only one IPA is supported, for Cantonese... not even for Mandarin... 70.29.208.129 (talk) 04:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep we have templates like {{Zh-tsp}}, {{zh-stpw}} etc, there's nothing wrong with having this one as well. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 04:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • For your information: I'm sorry, but as a rule in Wikipedia, votes from IP-address editors don't count. ;-) - Alan (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • FYI you're wrong. WP:CONSENSUS states that voting is not to be used, consensus building is the proper process. As for ignoring IP users, you're also wrong on that. Show me a policy page that states that IP users are worthless. Hell, look at the history of TfD to see that IP users do count. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 07:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's no longer used at Ashes of Time because you replaced it with {{Chinese}}, but that does not appear to be working at the moment - nothing appears. Unless you fix it I propose to revert. - Fayenatic (talk) 08:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It is not mutually exclusive to the proposed deletion of the template. Btw, Alanmak, you can't silence IP editors just because they chose not to use a username. They are still free to express their views. And majority of Wikipedia is built by IP editors anyways. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:29, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cantonese-j edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 02:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cantonese-j (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template does nothing more than adding a link to the Jyutping article. I don't think it is too hard to type [[ ]] that we need a template to do a link. Also, the template is no longer used in any article.
- Alan (talk) 12:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Nominator did not illustrate a valid reason for deletion. And XfD is not a venue to force improvements on the subject. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latest preview software release/Pidgin edit

Template:Latest preview software release/Pidgin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was nominator close as keep ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 18:27, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pidgin doesn't have "preview" releases so this page is unnecessary ~~ [ジャム][t - c] 08:06, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Muse awards edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Muse awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was previously being transcluded into Muse (band) which is against Wikipedia:Template namespace#Usage. "Templates should not masquerade as article content in the main article namespace; instead, place the text directly into the article." kollision (talk) 05:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and transclude content to article. Blatant misuse of template space. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Harry James Angus edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Harry James Angus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigates to too few articles. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep - five articles is perhaps just enough for a navigational template. It's only used on two of them, though... Robofish (talk) 01:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The topic covered by template directly includes only two articles (one of which is the main biography) and three "related articles". Looking at the content of the three other templates being used in Harry James Angus, I don't think that the presence of this fourth template facilitates navigation, since 4 of the 5 links present in this template are also present in the others. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 18:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IAST-hi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IAST-hi (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, orphaned template. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPRT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPRT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated template, all transclusions have been replaced. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Boston Red Sox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Boston Red Sox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, all transclusions replaced. The only links are in some talk, user spaces, and some references in a WikiProject. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom as obsolete and redundant. Robofish (talk) 01:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_May_25&oldid=1079914007"