Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 November 22

< November 21	November 23 >

November 22 edit

Template:Tinc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete; the kept template you see not deleted is not real and never has been. The cabal does not approve this decision. There is no cabal. --Xavexgoem (talk) is not a member of the cabal 15:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC) fnord[reply]

Template:Tinc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a rediculious and hypocritical essay label. If TINC then why would there be this label that seems to be an endorsement by some secret cabal. this isn't myspace here, this is just rediculous Ipatrol (talk) 22:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, for two reasons. 1) An encyclopedia created without enjoyment is an encyclopedia that is no fun to read. And we do need escape valves here - frequently. Deleting this would be a wowserish reaction to something which not only does no harm, but is an embellisment to pages that actually do us good as human beings and editors. 2) we need to keep telling people there's no Cabal, otherwise they may begin to suspect... Grutness...wha? 23:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this is one of the older ones, too. True, it's mostly for humors sake... but that is something WP desperately needs more of anyway Xavexgoem (talk) 17:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC) I'm a coordinator for WP:Mediation Cabal ;-)[reply]
Keep. How else am I supposed to keep track of who's denying the existence of The Cabal? — Gavia immer (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Computer says "Keep"!. What on earth is wrong? Its a template, its supposed to be humorous; heck - do you think we should have nothing remotely humorous on here? All work and no play makes Jack a very dull boy who will pop off from depression. Take it in the way its meant, a laugh, a bit of fun. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 03:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per all of the above, don't confuse fun with policy..--Comet styles 08:56, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Grow a sense of humour. ~ User:Ameliorate! ^{(with the !) (talk)} 10:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Doesn't look like anything disruptive. I have to agree with above comments. If WP:MYSPACE is interpreted that way, there are a lot of userboxes etc. that shouldn't be used on userpages as well. Chamal ^talk 12:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Voice actor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 00:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Voice actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Provides an external link to a non-notable website that's red linked and doesn't seem to meet WP:WEB. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not really a template. It's just an external link, and can be easily added to any relevant article without using a template (you don't need a template to add just one link to an article). I don't see any need to keep this. Chamal ^talk 01:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom. --Klein zach 01:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Island at War episodes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Island at War episodes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All episodes of this show are covered in one article now, so no need for this (badly designed) ep navigation template to remain. Already orphaned. – sgeureka ^t•c 09:02, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not needed anymore. All links lead to the same page through a redirect. Chamal ^talk 11:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yep, not needed anymore. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 20:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not used. --Lemming64 20:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TVChannelsinMontenegrin edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TVChannelsinMontenegrin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

seems to be a misnamed list article. superseded by List of Montenegrin language television channels. Piccolo Modificatore Laborioso (talk) 04:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is an article, not a template. And it's an article that we already have. Possibly a 'TV channels in Montenegro' template might be appropriate, but this isn't it. Terraxos (talk) 04:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above. Clearly doesn't belong in the Template namespace and there's already an article on the subject, so delete is my !vote. Chamal ^talk 12:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Everything said above, obviously. It's not a template, or even a useful article. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 20:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.