Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 September 28

< September 27	September 29 >

September 28 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep, This is not a template, was not tagged, and is in userspace. MFD is down the hall. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ikiroid/User Jimbo v. Willy edit

User:Ikiroid/User Jimbo v. Willy

Gives attention to vandals. Delete per WP:DENY. -- Selmo ^(talk) 22:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close, not a template. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 00:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

User:Xaosflux/UBX/User religion flying spaghetti monster not really edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, not a template. >Radiant< 13:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'	This user does not believe in Flying Spaghetti Monsterism, but agrees it is as likely as creationism.

An inflammatory template that serves no constructive purpose. Userboxes that simply state that a user is an athiest, agnostic, etc. are fine, but there is no need for userboxes that attack specific religious or theological beliefs.--67.67.222.245 03:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--67.67.222.245 03:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
N.B. Nomination of this page for deletion is the only edit by this anon. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree. It is a clear insult to Flying Spaghetti Monster advocates to consider the chances of it existing as low as that. Or, to put it another way, there is no call for userboxes to compare one person's beliefs with another person's beliefs. Grutness...wha? 06:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, if we are going to be debating deleting user subpages, they belong in WP:MFD; this box was already userfied by WP:GUS. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:G0zh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No apparent purpose, only used in one namespace. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 00:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep See User:Harryy/Templets for an index of similar templates, they are used for printing a foreign typeset. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:G1zh edit

No apparent purpose, only used in one namespace. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 00:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep See User:Harryy/Templets for an index of similar templates, they are used for printing a foreign typeset. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:G2zh edit

No apparent purpose, only used in one namespace. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 00:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep See User:Harryy/Templets for an index of similar templates, they are used for printing a foreign typeset. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:G3zh edit

No apparent purpose, only used in one namespace. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 00:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep See User:Harryy/Templets for an index of similar templates, they are used for printing a foreign typeset. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Human sexuality edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, WP:NDT and CSD G4. >Radiant< 13:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Violates Wikipedia policy against dislaimers on pages.
Wikipedia:Content disclaimer already exists. We link it on every page.
Wikipedia:Graphic and potentially disturbing images policy asking for disclaimers was rejected Atom 13:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:FordEurope edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to keep. RyanG e rbil10(Kick 'em in the dishpan!) 00:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Early European Ford vehicles}} and {{Modern European Ford vehicles}}, and contains less information Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 20:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

keep it; it is still useful.
Keep. Useful and contains much information not found in {{Modern European Ford vehicles}}. jgp ^T_C 10:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What information? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 20:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - All the cars you don't find in {{Early European Ford vehicles}} and in {{Modern European Ford vehicles}}. For example Vedette, Comète, Rheinland, Eifel, Pilot, Prefect.
Delete. All the cars which don't appear in any of the European timelines should be added to them. It is just a long list of alphabetically ordered cars, while the timelines let you navigate through the ages and car categories. -- NaBUru38 15:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ... It (obviously) isn't an alphabetically ordered list ... it lists the cars in order of the date of first production. It contains many more models of cars and is much more compact than the {{Modern European Ford vehicles}} and {{Early European Ford vehicles}} DangerousDisco^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT_{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 15:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What should it be placed on though? Every article it would go on will have one of the other templates, making this one somewhat redundant. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 17:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.