Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/October/28
October 28
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was close for the time being. The renaming of the state appears to be under consideration rather than finalised. A new SfD nomination should be opened if the new name is accepted and becomes widely used.
State's name has officially changed to Odisha. Template and category should be renamed to {{Odisha-geo-stub}} and Cat:Odisha geography stubs to match. Propose keeping current template name as a redirect. Grutness...wha? 00:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename and keep direct per nomination. I'll move the main article (Orissa) to correspond with the name change. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, the main article has been move-protected for a few days now, which I disagree with, but in any case...I can't move the page. Regardless, I still believe the stubcat and template should be renamed. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That's interesting... When I nominated this, the page was at Odisha. Going by the page history and equivalent CfD it looks as if the naming hasn't been officially finalised yet, so perhaps this should be postponed for now... I'll withdraw the nom (temporarily, at least). Grutness...wha? 23:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:14, 26 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Rename to Cat:Astronomical observatory stubs to match permcat. Grutness...wha? 00:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename per nomination. Cat:Astronomical observatories is the associated permanent category, so the terminology here should match that anyway. In addition, a glance at Cat:Observatories indicates that there are several other types of observatories out there with their own categories: Cat:Bird observatories, Cat:Geophysical observatories, Cat:Meteorological observatories, etc. Since this stubcat merely deals with astronomical observatories, telescopes, and instruments, a rename is wholly appropriate. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.