Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/September/29

September 29

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete

This one was recently posted on WP:WSS/P and the discussion was closed as "do not create" (see: [1]). However, the template had already been created before the discussion started. Delete per the previous discussion. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 21:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per that discussion - we've been deliberately avoiding stub types for countries with severely limited international recognition due to fears of POV-pushing +c. I don't see any reason to revise that principle for this stub type. Grutness...wha? 23:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fixing up {{Cyprus-stub}} as necessary. Alai 16:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- (...and {{Cyprus-geo-stub}}, and any other similar subtypes) Grutness...wha? 23:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is Cyprus meaning the whole island, including the TRNC and the two British territories? - Privacy 21:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- yes. Grutness...wha? 04:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

- - When do geo stubs follow current political boundaries, and when do they don't? - Privacy 00:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/September/29

September 29

{{TRNC-stub}}